NOTICE OF MEETING

 

Notice is hereby given, in accordance with the provisions of the Local Government Act 1993 that a Meeting of the Corporate and Development Services Committee will be held in the Council Chambers, Queen Street Singleton, on Monday 13 September 2004, commencing at 5:30 pm.

 

 

AGENDA                                                                                                                            PAGE

 

Apologies

 

Confirmation of Minutes

1.       Corporate and Development Services Committee 9 August 2004

 

Mayoral Minute

   

Disclosures and Declarations of Interest

 

Withdrawal of Items and Late Items of Business

 

Presentations

 

Ashton Coal Operations Pty Limited

 

Public Access Session

 

  General Manager's Report No. 14/04

1.  Upper - Northern Hunter Regional Environmental Management Strategy.............................. 5

  Economic Development Officers Report No. 6/04

1.  Economic Development....................................................................................................... 9

Director Corporate and Development Services Report No. 23/04

1.  2003/2004 Annual Financial Reports................................................................................. 11

      

Manager Planning & Development Report No. 10/04

1.  Road Naming of Subdivision Road.................................................................................... 17

2.  Newcastle Sports Parachute Club Community Consultative Committee (NSPC CCC)....... 23

 

3.  Rural Residential Development Strategy - Steering Committee............................................ 27

4.  Questions Without Notice.................................................................................................. 28

5.  Subdivision - 14 Allotments............................................................................................... 29

6.  Water Quality Monitoring Program.................................................................................... 65

7.  United Coal Mine CCC..................................................................................................... 67

8.  Minutes of Glennies Creek Community Consultative Committee......................................... 68

9.  Hunter Valley Operations CCC......................................................................................... 72

10..... Camberwell Coal Community Consultative Committee.................................................. 77

11..... Minutes of Liddell Coal Mine Community Consultative Committee Meeting................... 82

12..... Minutes of Ashton Coal Mine Community Consultative Committee Meeting................... 87

                

Questions Without Notice

 

  

 

 

…………………………………………..

GENERAL MANAGER


 

Singleton Council’s Vision Statement is:

 

“Singleton.  A progressive community of excellence and sustainability”

 

 

Singleton Council’s Mission Statement is:

 

“To provide quality services to the community in an efficient and friendly manner encouraging responsible development”

 

 

Singleton Council’s Core Values are:

 

 

 

Value

Definition

·  

Service

Putting the needs of customers first and achieving excellence in customer service;

 

·  

Consistency

Having a professional approach to work with the highest ethical standards and a businesslike manner across the organisation;

 

·  

Focus

Maintaining a clear focus on the vision and agreed goals;

 

·  

Respect

Earning and retaining the respect of the community;

 

·  

Pride

General pride in works and services;

 

·  

Communication

Excellence in communications;

 

·  

Achievement

Developing a well trained, motivated and focussed staff and elected Council;

 

·  

Equity

Being a fair and equitable employer and provider of services;

 

·  

Reliance

Ensuring that the community, elected Council and staff can rely upon each other;

 

·  

Commitment

Displaying commitment and cohesion between community, elected members and staff;

 

·  

Efficiency

Services provided by the organisation are to be carried out with the efficient allocation of resources;

 

 

 

 

 


 

COUNCIL POLICY

 

Pecuniary and Conflict of Interest Issues

 

Council adopted the following policies on 25 September 2000

 

·    Code of Conduct

·    Conflict of Interest

 

These policies provide details of statutory requirements and give guidance in respect of the way in which pecuniary and conflict of interest issues should be approached.

 

Generally, the policies refer to the following issues:

 

1.         Councillors are under an obligation at law to disclose any interest they may have in any matter before the Council and to refrain from being involved in any consideration or to vote on any such matter.

 

2.         Councillors must disclose any interest in any matter noted in the business paper prior to or at the opening of the meeting.

 

3.         The nature of the interest shall be included in the notification.

 

4.         Councillors shall immediately and during the meeting disclose any interest in respect of any matter arising during the meeting which is not referred to in the business paper.

 

5.         All declarations of interest shall be recorded by the General Manager.

 

6.         All disclosures of interest shall as far as is practicable be given in writing.

 

7.         Any member having an interest shall leave the meeting and remain absent while the subject of the interest is being considered by Council.

 

8.         The meeting shall not discuss any matter in which a councillor has an interest while the councillor is present at the meeting.

      


SINGLETON COUNCIL  Minutes_Item

Meeting of the Corporate and Development Services Committee - 13 September 2004

 

 

 

General Manager's Report No. 14/04

 

 

 

  Minutes_Item

1.

Upper - Northern Hunter Regional Environmental Management Strategy

Author: Steve McGrath       

FILE: 01-0509

 

 

Executive Summary

 

Councillors will recall that at the Council Meeting following the election of the new Council in March, 2004, Councillors were nominated and subsequently appointed to a variety of Committees and Organisations on which Council is represented.  One Committee that was not considered was the Upper – Northern Hunter Regional Environmental Management Strategy.

 

Councillors may recall that this was intentionally deferred at the time as the Board of Hunter Councils Inc. was undertaking a process of rationalising the operations of this Committee and the equivalent body within the Lower Hunter.  This process has now been concluded and a copy of an item of correspondence from Hunter Councils Inc. is attached to this report for Councillors perusal.

 

Part 1 of the letter deals with matters impacting on the Lower Hunter and Central Coast REMS Steering Committee which has no impact on Singleton Council.

 

Part 2 of the letter deals with the appointment of the members to the Hunter Central Coast REMS Steering Committees and in this regard the correspondence suggests that Member Councils each nominate two representatives (one Councillor and one professional officer) to the relevant Steering Committee to provide strategic guidance to HCC REMS Projects and Programs.

 

One of the attachments to the correspondence from Hunter Councils Inc. makes reference to the roles and responsibilities of the HCC REMS Steering Committees.

 

Council’s Manager Planning & Development Services is the Council officer who has been authorised to attend the Upper Northern Hunter REMS Steering Committee.

 

It is now necessary for Council to appoint a Councillor representative to the Upper Northern Hunter REMS Steering Committee.

 

 

RECOMMENDED that Council nominate a Councillor for appointment to the Upper – Northern Hunter REMS Steering Committee.

 

 

  Attachments

AT-1 View

Upper - Northern Hunter REMS

3 page(s)

 

 

 

 

Steve McGrath

General Manager


Attachment 1

General Manager's Report No. 14/04

Upper - Northern Hunter REMS

Upper - Northern Hunter Regional Environmental Management Strategy

 

 

 


 


 


  


SINGLETON COUNCIL

Meeting of the Corporate and Development Services Committee - 13 September 2004

 

 

 

Economic Development Officer’s Report No. 6/04

 

 

 

1.  Minutes_Item

Economic Development

Author: Don Gray        

FILE: 02/0028

 

During the months of July and August 2004 Councils Economic Development Officer  (EDO) dealt with the following items:

 

1.1 Inquiries

 

Property Inquiries (Apart from  Country Week)

·    Industrial            11

·    Commercial        5

·    Residential          3

 

General Inquiries

·    Familiarisation tours      1

·    Statistical Inquiries     9

 

1.2 Meetings

          Coal Awareness Days

 

          The traditional Coal Discussion Day will this year be replaced by a two day event to be

known as Coal Awareness Days.

 

          On the afternoon of Friday 29 October proceedings will be opened by the Minister for   Minerals and Energy the Hon. Kerry Hickey MP. This session will consist of two speakers      and a forum to discuss the sustainability of the mining industry.

 

          On Saturday 30 October mine site tours will be conducted for the public.

 

          Towns and Villages Futures Program (TVFP)

 

           On Wednesday 21 July 2004 a second community meeting of the TVFP was held at Bulga     and was well supported. Further workshopping was undertaken and  subsequently a Strategic

          Plan for the local communities was produced.

         

          Five key initiatives (in order of priority) that were identified were:

·           Brand for the whole region

·           Visitor Information Centre

·           Combined newsletter

·    Improved access to national parks

·    Arrest or reverse Wollombi Brook degradation

         

As a result of these findings an application for a second round of funding for “Branding and       Marketing” the region has been submitted under the same program. This application had to be       submitted by 01 September 2004 to avoid a 12 month delay.


 

          Singleton Development Support Team (SDST)

          The SDST has undertaken as survey of 420 businesses to establish the skills shortage and        training needs of businesses in the LGA.

          120 responses have been received and a further report will be issued on the results.

 

          Country Week

         

          Councils EDO attended Country Week in at Homebush Stadium in Sydney for 13 – 15 August 2004. Singleton, along with around 30 other Councils had a stand aimed at attracting   persons to Singleton particularly those with trade skills. Two local businesses, Ellavale and     Jim Gaulds Building assisted with the manning the displays.

 

          Interest in move out of Sydney to rural NSW was high and to date one business and one          family have indicated their intention to relocate.

 

2.0  Statistical Data

          A review of development applications received by Councils for the first six months of 2004 is   shown below:

 

          January to March 2004 (Value in $1000 of applications)

          Residential                      $15132

          Industrial                        $ 733

          Commercial          $476

          Infrastructure                  $942

          Tourism                          $1502

          Mining/Power                 $132

 

          Housing applications       67

 

          April to June 2004

          Residential                      $13832

          Industrial                        $315

          Commercial          $1740

          Infrastructure                  $10626

          Tourism                          $104

         

          Housing applications       64

 

 

FOR COUNCIL’S INFORMATION

 

 

 

Attachments

There are no attachments for this report.


 

 

 

 

Don Gray                                                            K S McMurray

Economic Development Officer                        Director Corporate & Development Services


 

1.

2003/2004 Annual Financial Reports

Author: Anthony Egan        

FILE:  

 

 

Executive Summary

 

To present details of the Draft Annual Reports to Council for adoption and referral for audit.

 

 

Background:

 

Annually Council is required to refer the Annual Financial Reports for audit.

 

Management Plan:

 

The 2003/2004 Annual Financial Reports represents Council Financial performance for the 2003/2004 Financial Year which formed part of Council’s adopted 2003/2004 Management Plan.

 

Council Policy:  N/A

 

Legislation:

 

Section 413, 415 and 416 of the Local Government Act 1993 requires that the Council’s General Purpose and Special Purpose Annual Financial Reports for 2003/2004 to be prepared, referred to audit and audited by 31 October, 2004.

 

In regards to this process, Council is required to authorise the referral of the Financial Reports to Council’s Auditor. In addition, Section 413 (2)(c), requires that Council provide a statement as to its opinion on the annual financial statements of account. This statement must be made by resolution of the Council and signed by the Mayor, at least one other Councillor, the General Manager and the Responsible Accounting Officer (Manager Finance), in accordance with the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1999.

 

Sustainability:

                        Social:                      N/A

 

                        Environmental:        N/A

 

            Financial:  The financial result for 2003/2004 is shown on the Statement of Financial Performance which indicates a surplus from all activities of $14,524,000. Incorporated in this result is the identification of $2,983,000 from developers being the valuation of infrastructure assets that have been dedicated to Council during the 2003/2004 financial year.

 

                                    The result before capital amounts shows a surplus of $7,930,000 which includes a depreciation expense of $6,585,000.

 

 

 

 

The 2003/2004 Financial Reports disclose a land development profit of $8,405,000 following the sale of 97 lots. This result represents an increase of $6,621,000 from the previous financial year.

 

Note 13 to the Financial Statements details Council's key financial indicators. The Current Ratio indicates the adequacy of working capital and the ability to satisfy obligations in the short term for the consolidated entity. The consolidated Current Ratio stands at 3.07 as at 30 June 2004.

 

The Unrestricted Current Ratio assesses the adequacy of working capital and the ability to satisfy obligations in the short term for the unrestricted activities of Council. This ratio has decreased to 2.84 as at 30 June 2004.

 

Council will be more aware of the Debt Service Ratio which assesses the degree to which revenues are committed to the repayment of debt. This ratio for the consolidated entity stands at 2.62%. 

 

The Rate Coverage Ratio indicates the proportion of rate income to total income received for the financial year.  This indicator provides a good representation of Council's reliance on rate income to offset expenditure. As at 30 June 2003 this ratio stood at 29.61%, which is down on the prior year due to increases in proceeds from land sale and developer provided assets.

 

The Rates and Charges Outstanding percentage has decreased to 2.03%. This represents an improvement of 34% on the previous years result.

 

The financial indicators referred to in this report have been incorporated in Attachment A for quick reference.

 

 

Consultation:  N/A

 

Risk Management:  N/A

 

Options:

 

Council is required by legislation to refer the Annual Financial Reports for Audit. Accordingly there is no other option than to adopt the recommendation.

 

Conclusions:

 

A further report will be presented to Council’s Ordinary Meeting to be held on 23 September 2004 in relation to the actual cash position of Council performance for the 2003/2004 financial year.

 

 

RECOMMENDED

 

That in accordance with the provisions of Section 413 (2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993 (as amended) and the Financial Management Regulations, in Council's opinion:

 

a)         the Council's Annual Financial Report has been prepared in accordance with;

(i)         the Local Government Act 1993 (as amended) and Regulations,  and

(ii)        the Statement of Accounting Concepts,  and

(iii)       the Local Government Code of Accounting Practice and Financial Reporting,  and

(iv)       the Local Government Asset Accounting Manual,  and

(v)        the Australian Accounting Standards.

 

            the reports present fairly the Council's financial position and operating result for the year,  and

 

            the reports accord with the Council's accounting and other records,  and

 

            we are not aware of anything that would make the reports false or misleading in any way.

 

b)         That the Special Purpose Financial Reports have been drawn up in accordance with the Local Government Code of Accounting Practice and Financial Reporting.

 

c)         That the General and Special Purpose Financial Reports be certified by the Mayor, Deputy Mayor, General Manager and Responsible Accounting Officer (Manager Finance).

 

d)         That Council approves the Annual Financial Statements of Accounts (including General Purpose and Special Purpose Reports) for the year ending 30 June, 2004 being referred for audit.

 

 

 

 

 

Attachments

AT-1 View

Statement of Performance Measure

1 page(s)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 K S McMurray

Director Corporate & Development Services


Attachment 1

Director Corporate and Development Services Report No. 23/04

Statement of Performance Measure

2003/2004 Annual Financial Reports

 

 

 

      


SINGLETON COUNCIL  Minutes_Item

Meeting of the Corporate and Development Services Committee - 13 September 2004

 

 

 

Manager Planning & Development Report No. 10/04

 

 

 

1.

ROAD NAMING OF SUBDIVISION ROAD

Author: Mark Ihlein       

FILE: SA 29/1994

 

 

Applicant:                        Mrs M J Tolmie

Owner:                            Mrs M J Tolmie

Land and Location:         Lot 1 DP 867984, 271 Retreat Road, Wattle Ponds

Zoning:                            Rural 1(d) Small Holdings

Proposal:                         Road Naming

Date of Application:        16 July, 2004

Responsible Officer:       Craig Maher

 

Executive Summary

 

N/A

 

Proposal

 

Council is currently in receipt of an application for the naming of a new subdivision road off Retreat Road, Wattle Ponds.

 

The applicant has submitted three names to be considered, and advised that the preferred name for the road is “Wilhannah Close”.

 

Wilhannah recognizes the applicant’s first Australian Ancestors, William and Hannah Singleton.  The chosen name is not included on Council’s list of possible road names however, given the historical significance the name is considered to have merit.

 

The road name selected is not currently in use within the Shire, and is therefore recommended for adoption as the road name for this new subdivision road.

 

History

 

Council approved a staged eleven (11) lot subdivision for Mr A & Mrs M J Tolmie on 10 July, 1996.  A locality plan is appended to this report as Attachment “1” and a plan of the proposed subdivision is appended as Attachment “2”

 

Site Characteristics

 

The proposed access road is currently being constructed directly off Retreat Road and will be completed in the near future.

 

Statutory Considerations

 

N/A

 

 

 

 

Sustainability:

                        Social                       N/A

                        Environmental         NA

                        Financial                  NA

 

Conclusions

 

The chosen road name is acceptable and should be adopted

 

RECOMMENDED

 

That Council pursuant to Section 162 of the Roads Act, 1993 and the Roads (General) Regulation, 2000, adopt the name Wilhannah Close as the name of the new subdivision road off Retreat Road, Wattle Ponds.

 

 

 

 

 

Attachments

AT-1 View

Locality Plan

1 page(s)

AT-2 View

Subdivision Plan

1 page(s)

 


Attachment 1

Manager Planning & Development Report No. 11/04

Locality Plan

ROAD NAMING OF SUBDIVISION ROAD

 

 

 


Attachment 2

Manager Planning & Development Report No. 11/04

Subdivision Plan

ROAD NAMING OF SUBDIVISION ROAD

 

 

 


SINGLETON COUNCIL  Minutes_Item

Meeting of the Corporate and Development Services Committee - 13 September 2004

 

 

 

Manager Planning & Development Report No. 10/04

 

 

 

2.

NEWCASTLE SPORTS PARACHUTE CLUB COMMUNITY CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE (NSPC-CCC)

Author: Mark Ihlein        

FILE: 00/0190

 

 

 Executive Summary

 

Council has requested the NSPC-CCC to determine whether or not the Committee should be dissolved.

 

 

A meeting of the NSPC-CCC was held on 27th February 2004, which amongst other matters, considered an item in respect of the continuance of the committee.  A copy of the Draft Minutes are attached.

 

Consideration of the item resulted from a request of Council to ask the committee to determine whether it should be dissolved.

 

The general consensus of the meeting was to disband the consultative committee.  However, it was agreed that the absent member of the committee should be consulted, Mr Steve Thornton, and his views sought.  A copy of the correspondence forwarded to Mr Thornton is attached.

 

As no written response was received the Manager Planning and Development Services spoke with Mr Thornton via telephone who advised he had no objection provided there was implementation of an appropriate process to deal with complaints and the committee can be reactivated at the request of either the NSPC or community representation.

 

Council has an existing complaints management system where customer action requests are logged and forwarded to an appropriate officer for investigation. Alternatively complaints may be made in writing to the General Manager which are forwarded to an officer for action.

 

 

RECOMMENDED

 

1.   That the Newcastle Sports Parachute Club Community Consultative Committee be dissolved.

 

2.   The Committee be reactivated at the request of either the Newcastle Sports Parachute Club or community representation.

 

 

 

Attachments

AT-1 View

Draft Minutes - Newcastle Parachute Club Community Consultative Committee

1 page(s)

AT-2 View

Letter to S Thornton - Newcastle Parachute Club Community Consultative Committee

1 page(s)

 


Attachment 1

Manager Planning & Development Report No. 11/04

Draft Minutes - Newcastle Parachute Club Community Consultative Committee

NEWCASTLE SPORTS PARACHUTE CLUB COMMUNITY CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE (NSPC-CCC)

 

 

 

 

DRAFT

MINUTES OF THE NSPC COMMUNITY CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE MEETING HELD ON FRIDAY 27 FEBRUARY 2004, AT SINGLETON COUNCIL’S ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING

ATTENDANCE   Mayor Cr F Harvison, P Maguire, M Roser, M Ihlein, 2 club reps

APOLOGISE       S Thornton

OPENING            Mayor Harvison – Chairman of the NSPC CCC opened the

ADDRESS           meeting at 9:00am.

 

BUSINESS ARISING

 

§ Chairmans function 2003 and Function 2004

 

§ Details on effluent system approved clarification as to what was submitted.

 

§ Discussion on noise testing of air craft.  Air services Aust comment on testing. Air Services letter to PM.

 

§ Suggestion to include additional data in any noise test results.

 

§ Committee reps policy requires min 2 and max 4 for club and community.

 

§ Issue raised about community reps living within the area.

 

§ No additional matters to do with the club.

 

§ Paul asked for an explanation on function weekends which was provided.

 

§ Fred discussed previous report and subsequent Council resolution on dissolving of the CCC.

 

§ Decision not to undertake vote to dissolve CCC as ST was not aware of this and it would be unfair to conduct a vote without knowledge of all members of this occurring.  The general consensus was however to disband the CCC subject to advice from Steve Thornton.

 

§ Flights per operating day.

 

§ Operating weekends per month.

 

§ Noise from functions.

 

§ PM concerns regarding the ability to monitor plane noise.

 

§ To include Council report and resolution to all committee members.

 

§ ST through MR to remind the club on no-flying weekend.

 

§ MI asked the committee to thank MR on his involvement in the CCC.

Closed Meeting – Mayor 10.15am


Enquiries to:  M Ihlein

02 6578 7330

 

Our Ref:         PN 00190

 

 

01 March 2004

 

 

Mr Steve Thornton

73 Bulwer Street

MAITLAND  NSW  2320

 

 

NEWCASTLE SPORTS PARACHUTE CLUB COMMUNITY CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE (NSPC CCC)

 

It is advised a meeting of the NSPC CCC was held on 27 February 2004 and considered an agenda item in respect of the future continuance of the committee.  This item is at the request of the Council which resolved to ask the committee to determine whether it should be disbanded.  A copy of the report to Council and the resolution is enclosed for your information.

 

The general consensus of the meeting was to disband the NSPC CCC, however it was agreed that prior to any formal resolution in this regard, you should be consulted as one of the community representatives and your views sought.

 

Should the CCC be disbanded, the meeting agreed that it would be subject to implementation of an appropriate process to deal with complaints and the committee can be reactivated at the request of either the NSPC or community representation.

 

It would be appreciated if you could provide your comments directly to the undersigned either in writing or verbally by Friday, 12 March 2004.

 

Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned should you require further clarification or wish to otherwise discuss the matter.

 

 

Mark Ihlein

Manager – Planning & Development Services

 

 

MI.jjg

 

CC       Clr Harvison, Mayor – Singleton Council, PO Box 314, Singleton

             Mr Paul Maguire, 664 Elderslie Road, Elderslie, 2330

             NSPC, PO Box 116, Branxton  2335


SINGLETON COUNCIL  Minutes_Item

Meeting of the Corporate and Development Services Committee - 13 September 2004

 

 

 

Manager Planning & Development Report No. 10/04

 

 

 

3.

RURAL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY - STEERING COMMITTEE

Author: Mark Ihlein        

FILE: 01/0059

 

 

 

Council will be aware that the Rural Residential Development Strategy has been under preparation for some considerable time.  Most of the delays in the process are a result of addressing issues raised by the National Parks and Wildlife Service in respect of biodiversity and Aboriginal archaeological issues.

 

Council officers have now received the Strategy report from the consultants which is currently being reviewed.  It is envisaged that during October the steering committee will need to be briefed and a detailed report subsequently presented to Council with a view to public exhibition.

 

The Councillor representation on the steering committee was former Councillor Golenia, and Councillor Urpeth, and Councillor McNamara.  It is now timely for Council to re-elect representatives to the committee. Given that the strategy will apply to the rural areas it is suggested that the four rural Councillors be elected.

 

The other members of the original steering committee were; Garry Hamblin – Surveyor, Murray Shaddock – Real Estate, Barry Russell – Landcare Co-ordinator, Kay Stacy – NSW Farmers Council, Keith Lobb – Rural Fire Service, Jo-Anne Adam – Rural Resident and Sue Moore – Resident.

 

It is proposed to write to each of the members to gauge their interest in participating in a briefing session during October.

 

 

RECOMMENDED

 

That the four rural Councillors be elected as Councils representatives for the Rural Residential Development Strategy Steering Committee.

 

 

 

Attachments

There are no attachments for this report.


SINGLETON COUNCIL  Minutes_Item

Meeting of the Corporate and Development Services Committee - 13 September 2004

 

 

 

Manager Planning & Development Report No. 10/04

 

 

 

4.

QUESTIONS WITHOUT NOTICE

Author: Mark Ihlein        

FILE: 01/0450

 

 

 

Q143/04 - Clr MacBain

 

Seeking clarification as to the difference between subdivisions resulting from Parish Portions compared with Torrens Title.

 

To fully answer this question the issue of dwelling entitlement and subdivision need to be addressed in respect of Parish Portions and Torrens Title lots.

 

 

Parish Portions

 

This is a form of “old system” title which can be transferred to different owners without the need for any Council approval. Within the 1 Rural Zone a dwelling can only be erected on land greater than 40 hectares or on an allotment of land with an area of less than 40 hectares where the land is an allotment created prior to 7th January, 1966 and comprises the whole of an existing holding.

 

There is a 40 hectare minimum subdivision provision and some limited concessional lot entitlements, where an existing holding has an area of not less than 10 hectares.

 

 

Torrens Title Lots

 

These are also sometime referred to as new systems title and are represented as a lot and DP.  The dwelling entitlement and subdivision provisions are the same as for Parish Portions.

 

 

 

 

Attachments

There are no attachments for this report.


SINGLETON COUNCIL  Minutes_Item

Meeting of the Corporate and Development Services Committee - 13 September 2004

 

 

 

Manager Planning & Development Report No. 10/04

 

 

 

5.

Subdivision - 14 Allotments

Author: Erica Duffy        

FILE: SA 39/2004 (DA 381/2004)

 

 

Applicant:                        Jall Projects

Owner:                            Stannic Securities Pty Ltd

Land and Location:         Lot 12 DP 219780

Zoning:                            Rural 1(a)

Proposal:                         To subdivide the land into fourteen (14) allotments

Date of Application:        8 June 2004

Responsible Officer:       Erica Duffy

 

Executive Summary

The applicant is requesting Council approval to subdivide a 528Ha lot into 13 x 40Ha allotments and a 1 x 4.5ha concessional allotment. The subject land has been used as a grazing and beef cattle stud. The application includes the construction of a new road providing access to 10 of the proposed allotments as well as an upgrading of Cranky Corner Road where it fronts the proposed lots. Furthermore, Council policy requires a proportional contribution to the upgrading of Cranky Corner Road between the subject land and the intersection with Stanhope Road, including a timber bridge crossing Stanhope Creek. The proportion of upgrading required is the proportion of additional lots created by this proposal in relation to the total number of lots with access via Cranky Corner Road.

 

The application is forwarded to Council for determination as there were objections to the proposal. The objections raised related to the condition of Cranky Corner Road, the subdivision of a large holding, possible adverse impacts on the natural environment and the provision of a farm-gate garbage service. These issues and other issues pertaining to the proposal are discussed in detail in the report.

 

The report concludes with the recommendation that the application be approved subject to the conditions listed which will mitigate possible adverse impacts from proposal. The approval is recommended as a deferred commencement pending the submission of a flood study which will provide Council with the extent of works necessary to ensure the existing timber bridge on Cranky Corner Road is of suitable construction and height to comply with Council requirements for the total number of vehicles using this road.

 

 

Proposal

This application is for the subdivision of a 528Ha allotment into 13 x 40Ha allotments and a 1 x 4.5Ha concessional allotment.

 

History

The subject land was created by a subdivision approved by Council in 1963. The land has owned by the same family for the last 40 years and run in conjunction with other adjoining land as a grazing and beef cattle stud.

 

Site Characteristics

The subject land is located on either side of Cranky Corner Road approximately 2kms from Stanhope Road. A Locality Map is appended to the report as Attachment “1”. The land to the east of Cranky Corner Road is characterized by a central ridgeline which trends in an east-west direction. This area is characterized by a number of intermittent streams which flow from the central ridge to Stanhope Creek which is along the property’s north boundary. Stanhope Creek then meanders through the property and exits at the south western. With the exception of a vegetated hill in the south-eastern corner, the eastern portion of the subject land has been extensively cleared of native vegetation reflecting its past and current use of livestock grazing. Land to the west of Stanhope Road is generally lower lying and includes the valley containing Stanhope Creek.

 

A copy of the proposed subdivision, overlayed on a topographic map, is appended to the report as Attachment “2”.

 

Statutory Considerations

 

(a)        the provision of:

 

(i)        Any environmental planning instrument.

EP&A Act

Under s91(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the proposal is Integrated Development requiring response from the NSW Rural Fire Service(RFS). The response from the RFS included one General Terms of Approval which has been included in the conditions.

 

Hunter Regional Environmental Plan

Under the provisions of Cl.27 of the Hunter Regional Environmental Plan 1989 (HREP), the concurrence of the Director-General of the Department of Agriculture is required prior to subdivision of prime crop and pasture land (Class 1, 2 or 3). Council’s maps show part of the subject land is Class 3 and part is Class 4. Council’s agriculture map does not show all the subject land, however it appears that the prime pasture land (Class 3p land) includes the land adjacent to Stanhope Creek which runs through the subject land.  Class 3 is defined as “Land not suitable to regular cultivation. Includes some arable and some pasture lands with moderate levels of agricultural production. Well suited to pasture improvement and can be cultivated for an occasional crop”. The suffix “p” is for pastures.

 

It appears from Council’s maps that the ridge which runs approximately east-west on the subject land is classified as Class 4 land. Class 4 is defined as “Land not suited for cultivation. Poor grazing or lands with seasonal grazing capabilities. Overall level of production is low.”

 

The concurrence of the NSW Department of Primary Industries (DPI) was sought for the proposal and their response is appended to the report as Attachment “3”.

 

The applicants response to the DPI submission has been appended to this report as Attachment “4”. Council officers conclude that while it may be regrettable that large, previously economically viable agricultural holdings are subdivided, this is a reflection of the economic value of land generally and is not isolated to this area, Singleton LGA or the Hunter Region.

 

Under the provisions of Singleton Local Environmental Plan 1996, the 1(a) Rural  zone objectives are:

 

(a)     to protect and conserve agricultural land and to encourage continuing viable and sustainable agricultural land use;

(b)     to promote the protection and preservation of natural ecological systems and processes;

(c)     to maintain the scenic amenity and landscape quality of the area;

(d)     to provide for the proper and co-ordinated use of rivers and water catchments;

(e)     to promote provision of roads that are compatible with the nature and intensity of development and the character of the area.

 

On balance it is considered that the proposal is consistent with the zone objective contained within the SLEP.

 

Singleton Local Environmental Plan

Under the provisions of Cl. 7(1)(a) of the Singleton Local Environmental Plan 1996 (SLEP), the minimum lot size for land zoned Rural 1(a) and with dwelling entitlement is 40 Ha. Under the provisions of Cl. 17(1)(c) and through a search of Council records one concessional allotment is permissible.

 

The proposal to create 13 x 40ha lots and 1 x 4.5ha lots is permissible.

 

(ii)       Any draft environmental planning instrument that is or has been placed on public exhibition and details of which have been notified to the consent authority.

No such document applies to the proposal or land.

 

(iii)      Any development control plan.

No development control plan applies to the proposal.

 

(iv)       Any matters prescribed by the regulations,  that apply to the land to which the development application relates.

No such matters apply to this land.

 

(b)       The likely impact of that development, including environmental impacts on both the natural and built environments, and social and economic impacts in the locality.

 

Context & Setting

Land to the north of the subject land is a grazing property which contains a dwelling. Land further north, off Bimbadeen Road has been recently subdivided and sold as 40Ha allotments. Land to the east and the west is predominantly used for grazing with a variety of holding sizes. Land to the south is predominantly used for grazing of livestock. The locality of Stanhope is located approximately 1km south of the subject land on Stanhope Road. Properties on either side of Stanhope Road are used for livestock grazing, lucerne production and cultivation of occasional vegetable crops.

 

The dominant feature of the landscape is the steep and vegetated ridges north of the subject land which contrasts with the cleared, undulating and rolling hills of the subject land and surrounding lands. The area is characterised by scattered dwellings associated  with rural grazing properties.

 

It is considered that the proposed development is not inconsistent with the surrounding land uses.

 

Access & Transport

The primary means of access to the proposed subdivision is via a new subdivision road which follows the main ridgeline that runs in an easterly direction through the site. The proposed road is approximately 2.2 kilometres long with a cul de sac at its extremity. This road intersects with Cranky Corner Road (South) approximately 2.9 kilometres from Stanhope Road. Cranky Corner Road at this location is currently of unsealed gravel formation in reasonable condition. Ten (10) of the proposed allotments are served directly by the new subdivision road and the remaining four (4) are accessed directly via Cranky Corner Road.

 

The proposal will result in an additional 126 vehicles per day (VPD) utilising Cranky Corner and Stanhope Roads. Stanhope Road is sealed, in good condition and considered of sufficient width to handle the additional traffic loading generated by this subdivision. As mentioned above Cranky Corner Road is currently unsealed and will therefore require upgrading to handle the additional traffic loading generated by this subdivision.

 

The applicant has undertaken an analysis of the lots currently served by Cranky Corner Road, and has determined that 48 lots currently utilise Cranky Corner Road.

Therefore, the additional 14 lots created by this subdivision represent a net increase in vehicle movements on Cranky Corner Road of approximately 22.5%. This figure will be utilised to determine the required upgrading of the existing timber bridge on Cranky Corner Road and the required upgrading of Cranky Corner Road towards Stanhope Road.  The works department has advised the cost to upgrade the timber bridge is $120,000.00.  Therefore, based on the 22.5% increase in vehicle movements, the calculated contribution towards the bridge upgrade is $27,000.00.  In respect of the required road upgrade, the applicant will be required to upgrade 22.5% of the 2.1 kilometres of Cranky Corner Road from the development site to Stanhope Road, a distance of 470 metres.  Both the contribution and road upgrade will be reflected as conditions of consent.

 

       Road Standards:

 

       New Subdivision Road

 

·    Cranky Corner Road to the eastern boundary of proposed Lot 3 – 7 metre seal on 8 metre formation.

·    From the eastern boundary of proposed Lot 3 onwards – 4 metre seal on 6 metre formation with passing bays every 200 metres and a 12.5 metre radius cul de sac bulb.

 

Cranky Corner Road

 

·    From the western boundary of the subject land to the intersection of the proposed subdivision road – 7 metre seal on 8 metre formation.

·    From the intersection of the proposed road to midway along the boundary of proposed Lot 1 – 4 metre seal on 6 metre formation.

 

All of the above road requirements will be reflected as conditions of consent.

 

Utilities

Overhead power is currently available to the subject land. Council will require the applicant to provide documentary evidence from the electricity supplier that provisions have been made for power supply to each proposed allotment. A condition has been included requiring this.

 

A Council approved On Site Sewerage Management Systems (OSSMS) will be required for dwellings on each of the proposed lots. The applicant advises that consultant geotechnical engineers and scientists concluded that effluent from future residents of the subdivision could be safely disposed of within the potential building envelopes for each of the proposed vacant allotments. Various methods for on-site treatment will be able to be utilised given the size of the allotments, soil types and distances to streams and watercourses.

 

Potable water will be obtained by the collection and storage of roof water in appropriately sized tanks. A postal service, school bus and a garbage collection service is available at the intersection of Cranky Corner Road and Stanhope Road.

 

Heritage

An archaeological assessment was undertaken with local aboriginal community organisations including Mindaribba Local Aboriginal Land Council, Lower Wanaruah Tribal Consultancy Pty Ltd, the Combined Council Hunter Valley Aboriginal Corporation, Wanaruah Custodians, Lower Wanaruah Tribal Council Inc and the Ungooroo Aboriginal Corporation. The major findings of the assessment were that there are several sites considered to be of medium – high archaeological significance due to their nature, content and location.

 

The report concluded with the following recommendations:

·   The study area is considered to have Aboriginal heritage potential.

·   The above conclusion is reached based on Aboriginal consultation and advice, background archaeological/historical research, field assessment and land-use history.

·   Several Aboriginal sites recorded (ie Stanhope Creek 9,15 & 17) are considered to be of medium-high archaeological significance due to their undisturbed nature, contents and location. Buffer zones will be required to be placed around these sites to prevent further disturbance. Attachment “5” notes the location of these sites.

·   The remaining seven sites and nine isolated finds are considered to be of low archaeological significance, due to their physical condition and the potential for insitu cultural material to be found in association with them.

·   In order for the sub-division proposal to proceed without delay; sites and artefacts that have been recorded would need to be conserved. As most of the building and construction is associated with flat dry ground, it is unlikely that any of the artefacts recorded will be disturbed as a result of development impacts.

·   If the development impacts were likely to affect existing Aboriginal Sites and Objects, the sub-division proposal would be required to seek Section 90 Consent Approval under the NSW National Parks & Wildlife Service Act 1974. This would require additional archaeological assessment work and may delay project construction for up to 8 weeks.

·   If as a result of any future development on the land, Aboriginal objects or sites are located, the developer is required by law to stop all work and immediately inform the NSW National Parks & Wildlife Service.

 

Conditions have been included that reflect the above recommendations.

 

Council received a letter from Noel Downs from the Wanaruah Local Aboriginal Land Council requesting that they be involved in a survey of the subject land. On the 13th July 2004, Council advised the Wanaruah Local Aboriginal Land Council that an Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Survey had already been undertaken on the subject land in the preparation of the Statement of Environmental Effects. No further correspondence has been received from the Wanaruah Local Aboriginal Land Council.

 

Water

The subject land is not prone to inundation by waters associated with a 1:100 year flood event of the Hunter River. Localised flooding associated with Stanhope and Pine Creeks are generally contained within stream banks. Any flooding would be of short duration, typical of first and second order watercourses on the upper end of catchments. Each of the proposed allotments contains a potential dwelling envelope which is elevated and flood free.

 

Flora & fauna

A flora and fauna assessment of the land was undertaken and included in the Statement of Environmental Effects. The flora and fauna assessment concluded that one threatened species (Grey-crowned Babbler), no endangered populations, and/or endangered ecological communities of State or national environmental significance were observed within the site during the survey period. There is anecdotal evidence, from the previous landowner indicating the presence of two threatened species, namely the Spotted-tailed Quoll and the Brush-tailed phascogale. The clearing of native vegetation will be minimal as a result of the proposal and there is unlikely to be any significant impact on local and/or regional wildlife corridors.

 

The assessment concludes that there is unlikely to significant impact on matters of State or National Environmental Significance provided the following recommendations are undertaken:

·   Retain mature trees where possible;

·   Restrict tree felling to periods of low fauna breeding activity such as autumn;

·   Assess the occupancy of tree hollows prior to the initiation of land clearing activities;

·   Replace tree hollows lost to the redevelopment of the site by erecting appropriately dimensioned nest boxes in suitable locations at a ratio of 2:1 or greater;

·   Install road signs on Cranky Corner Road, near the western boundary of the site, to raise driver awareness to threatened species activity within the road corridor. The road signs should indicate the type of species or fauna in the area; and

·   Discourage the collection of fallen timber and cutting down of trees (including dead trees) by future residents through appropriate signage at environmentally sensitive locations.

 

The recommendations of the report are reflected in the recommended conditions of approval.

 

Natural hazards

Both the subject property and Cranky Corner Road are affected by Stanhope Creek. A timber bridge on Cranky Corner Road currently spans Stanhope Creek.

It is understood that the existing bridge may be inundated in the larger flood events ie: 100 and 50 year ARI and thus isolating the newly created lots for a short period of time. The applicant will therefore be required to carry out a flooding / drainage study to determine the exact level and duration of inundation of the existing bridge. The study will ensure the bridge is not adversely affected by the calculated flood flows, and will aid in determining the final mode of upgrade to be carried out.  The study has not been provided to date and will therefore be conditioned as a deferred commencement condition.

 

The subject land has a few areas that are within a bushfire prone area. The areas correspond to isolated areas of existing vegetation generally along the south and east boundaries of the land. The proposal is integrated development and was referred to the Rural Fire Service (RFS) for concurrence. The RFS have provided the General Terms of Approval and these are included in the conditions.

 

Socio-economic impact in the locality

The applicant advises that the subject land has been farmed by the one family for 40 years and the previous owner has relocated the business to a larger property with the intention of expanding the breeding stock and drought proofing the farm, thereby continuing and developing a sound farming business with benefits to the wider economy. Property values in the Hunter Valley have increased and this makes it difficult to sustain a business of this type and size in this locality.

 

A school bus service, postal deliveries and garbage service are available at the junction of Stanhope Road and Cranky Corner Road. Stanhope locality includes a community tennis court and Rural Fire Brigade which provides a focus for the residents of the area. Retail and commercial services are available within 30 mins drive of the property at Singleton, Branxton and Maitland.

 

The proposed subdivision will create one small rural retreat and 13 small farming sites which have the potential to increase rural productivity and provide direct and indirect employment and population growth in the Stanhope, Branxton and Singleton communities.

 

There have been several similar type developments undertaken in recent years in Lambs Valley and Bimbadeen Road. It is understood that most of this land has been sold and there continues to be a market for land. The local building industry and associated trades will benefit from subdivision work and subsequent housing and development.

 

New and existing residents will benefit from the establishment and embellishment of community based facilities due to the proponent contribution to Council’s s94 Contributions Plan.

 

 

Site design

The layout of the proposed subdivision includes a new road which runs along the central ridge with 10 proposed allotments having access to this road and four allotments with access onto Cranky Corner Road. Each of the proposed allotments have nominated at least one dwelling site, these are considered to generally comply with Council requirements which includes minimum boundary setbacks, flood free sites with suitable asset protection distances for bushfire protection. The design of the proposal is considered to comply with Council requirements with respect of layout. Suitable access crossings will be required to each of the proposed lots.

 

Cumulative impact

The proposal is similar to previously approved subdivisions in Lambs Valley and Bimbadeen Road. These approvals have resulted in change in the physical, social, cultural and economic character of the area. As previously discussed in the report, there is a continued demand for this type of development in this general locality. On balance the proposal is unlikely to have any significant increased adverse impact in the locality.

 

Any negative cumulative impact on the existing road network has been addressed by either road upgrading or the payment of contributions to cover the cost of upgrading the existing infrastructure on a “pro rata” basis.

 

(c)        The suitability of the site for development

.

The proposal is considered to fit in the locality and the site attributes are considered to be conducive to the development.

 

(d)       Any submissions made in accordance with this Act or the regulations.

 

The proposal was notified for ten days and four submissions were received. The submissions are summarised below and copies are appended to the report as Attachment “S1” to “S4”.

(S1) Maureen & George Dick – object to the proposal due to increased noise and dust levels from the additional traffic using Cranky Corner Road, run-off will destroy Stanhope Creek and increased numbers of domestic dogs and cats will become feral and attack native birds and animals.

 

(S2) RB & RW Johnson – request that Cranky Corner Road should be upgraded and tar sealed to at an least 8m width and that the environmental issues need to be addressed prior to the development being approved.

 

(S3) Rodney Taylor – opposes the proposal because this has been one of the largest and a very successful agricultural enterprise in Stanhope. Mr Taylor is concerned that productive country is being subdivided in the interests of developer profit.

 

(S4) Linda & John Butler – request that Cranky Corner Road is widened, tar sealed and maintained by Council, that garbage service is available at the farm gate, that the waterways and riparian zones are protected and that developers advise potential buyers that a coal mine may be started nearby.

 

 

PLANNERS COMMENTS

·    The issue of road network has been previously discussed in Cl. b Access and transport.

·    With the issue of increased noise levels and quality of amenity will deteriorate, it is considered that the subdivision of the land into 40Ha allotments would not have an adverse impact upon the acoustic air quality amenity of the area.

·    With the issue that run-off will destroy Stanhope Creek, it is considered that all proposed allotments contain a dwelling site removed from Stanhope Creek. Geotechnical and scientific investigations undertaken have demonstrated that on-site effluent disposal could safely occur on each allotment. The issue of erosion and sedimentation control will be managed via conditions requiring erosion and sediment control.  Erosion and sediment control will be considered at development stage with subsequent dwellings proposed for resultant allotments.

·    The issue of domestic cats and dogs becoming feral and attacking cats and dogs are no more likely to occur in this locality compared to any other. A condition may be included requiring a “restriction as to user” be created prohibiting domestic cats in relation to the subdivision.

·    The issue of the property being run as a successful cattle breeding enterprise and should not be subdivided is previously discussed in (a)(i) Any environmental planning instrument Hunter Regional Environmental Plan 1989.

·    The issue of signposting the road will be considered as part of the road upgrading and any signposting considered necessary by Council officers will be included in the construction.

·    The issue of a garbage service at the farm gate will be assessed by appropriate Council officers when there is sufficient demand for such a service.

·    The issue that the subdivision should protect waterways and riparian zones has been previously discussed above in the third dot point.

 

(e)              The public interest.

 

Under the provisions of the Singleton Council Section 94 Contributions Plan No. 1, the following contributions are payable:

·   Shire Open Space ($258 x 13)

·   Community Facilities ($645 x 13)

·   Rural Roads – sealed ($1760 x 13)

·   Section 94 Studies

 

Sustainability:

 

                   Social

The social character of an area changes with the subdivision of large holdings into smaller holding.  This subdivision is consistent with the requirements of relevant planning documents.  The proposal will attract Section 94 contributions which will be used to enhance existing and future community facilities.

 

It is considered the community is unlikely to sustain any disadvantage as a result of this proposal.

 

            

       Environmental

The subject land is predominantly cleared of vegetation. No threats of serious or irreversible environmental damage or lack of scientific certainty have been identified in the environmental investigations undertaken in support of this application.

 

The flora and fauna assessment concludes that the development is unlikely to impact upon any threatened flora or fauna in the area. The conditions included should ensure that any flora or fauna existing in the area are provided with a reasonable environment for continued survival and that biological diversity and ecological integrity should be conserved for the benefit of future generations.

 

         Financial

The proposal to create 14 allotments where there is currently one agricultural holding is likely to result in diversification and intensification of the agricultural activities on the subject land as well as injection of capital into the activity. It is considered that the conditions recommended should ensure that the environment is protected and preserved which will provide financial sustainability.

 

Conclusions

The proposal is to subdivide an existing holding with an area of 528 Ha into 14 allotments comprising 13 x 40ha allotments and a concessional allotment with an area of 4.5Ha. The proposal includes the creation of a new access road along the ridge which runs centrally through the property approximately in an east-west direction. The applicant has nominated a suitable dwelling site on each of the proposed allotments which generally complies with Council requirements. The proposal is considered to generally be of merit and is recommended fro approval by deferred commencement pending the submission of information pertaining to the construction of the access road.

 

RECOMMENDED

That the proposal be approved as deferred commencement subject to the following conditions:

 

DEFERRED COMMENCEMENT CONDITION:

The applicant shall carry out a flooding analysis of the existing bridge over Stanhope Creek. The bridge shall be modelled for a variety of ARI events up to and including the 100 year ARI event. The study shall include the level and duration of any inundation of the bridge and modelling of the impact of the calculated flood flows on the existing bridge. All calculations shall be carried out in accordance with Australian Rainfall and Runoff and Council’s Development Engineering Specifications. Full details and calculations shall be submitted to and approved by Council.

Reason:  To ensure adequate and safe access is available to the development site.

This consent does not operate until this condition has been fulfilled and Council has issued a written notice to this effect.


That the above application be approved subject to the following conditions:-

 

1.    APPROVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS – The development shall be carried out in accordance with the development application, accompanying plans and documents described as PLAN OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION OF LOT 12 DP 219780 351 CRANKY CORNER ROAD STANHOPE (revised) dated 23/08/04  and submitted on 8/6/04 & 25/August 2004.

 

Notes:

·   Any alterations to the drawings and/or documentation, as approved by Council, will require further Council consent as per s96 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act.

·   No other works, other than those approved by this consent notice, shall be carried out without prior consent from Council.

 

          2.       SURVEY MARKS - There being no interference with or destruction of Survey                       Marks and Council is to be advised in writing if any such interference occurs.

 

                   Reason: To protect the integrity of existing survey marks.

 

3.       COUNCIL INDEMNITY - The Council is to be indemnified for the cost of damage        caused to Council property (such as kerb and guttering and footpath) during any        construction works carried out in accordance with the approval submitted plans   and accompanying documentation.

 

Reason: To protect Council from incurring costs associated with damage caused by a third party.

         

          4.       RESTRICTION ON CONSTRUCTION WORKS - Construction activities on the                          site being carried out between 7.00 a.m. and 6.00 p.m. Monday to Friday and 8.00                           a.m. to 1.00 p.m. Saturday (Sundays and Public Holidays prohibited) and not                           interfering with       the amenity of the neighbourhood by reason of noise, dust or                        interference with traffic.

 

             Reason:  To protect the existing amenity of the locality.

 

5.       RESTRICTION ON WORKS – No spoil or fill is to encroach upon the adjacent           bushland/public reserve during the duration of works.

                  

                   Reason:  To protect the existing amenity the locality and Council’s existing                                         infrastructure.

         

6.       DRAINAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION - No interference to the flows in the watercourses during the construction of the proposed culverts and/or bridges, roads and           associated works.

 

                   Reason: To protect the existing waterways and reduce the risk of environmental damage.

         

7.       REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY WORKS - All temporary drainage, silt and sediment control devices are to be removed at the completion of construction works and disturbed areas restored to the satisfaction of Council.

 

Reason: To clarify the terms of consent.

 

 

 

8.       CONSTRUCTION SIGNS - During the construction period, a sign of approximately 2 metres by 2 metres is to be erected to display particulars relating to the proposed works, including the name of the subdivider, the project supervisor, the contractor, a contact number for complaints or inquiries, and the hours of work.  The sign is to be    maintained in good condition during the construction period.

 

Reason: To clarify the terms of consent.

 

9.       SUBDIVISION CERTIFICATE FEE – Payment of a Subdivision Certificate Fee being 120.00, prior to the final plan of subdivision being endorsed by Council.

 

                   Reason:  To comply with Council’s adopted fees and charges.

 

10.     SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS - Following the final survey, each lot is to comply with Council's subdivision requirements.

 

                   Reason:  To ensure that the subdivision is carried out in accordance with Council’s                             subdivision requirements.

 

11.     COMPLETION OF WORKS - Construction of all works to Council's satisfaction prior to the lodgement and release of the final plan of subdivision.

 

                   Reason: To ensure completion of construction prior to registration of the linen plan.

 

12.     SUBDIVISION CERTIFICATE – Submission of an application for a Subdivision Certificate accompanied by the final plan of subdivision and 5 prints pursuant to Clause 79R of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Amendment Regulation 1998.

 

                   Reason: To provide for certification of the subdivision plan.

 

13.     SUBMISSION OF ENGINEERING PLANS - Submission of an application for a Construction Certificate and 3 copies of engineering plans and specifications in           accordance with Singleton Shire Councils Development Design and Construction.      Specifications shall be provided for approval prior to the commencement of construction works.  The following plans are to be provided:-

 

a.       Minimum 80km/h design speed.

b.      The access road (from Cranky Corner Road to the eastern boundary of proposed Lot 3) to be designed in accordance with Council’s Rural Road Construction standard being an 8 metre wide formation with a 7 metre wide, 2 coat bitumen seal and a minimum pavement thickness of 220 mm .

c.       The access road (from the eastern boundary of proposed Lot 3 onwards) to be designed in accordance with Council’s Rural Road Construction standard being an 6 metre wide formation with a 4 metre wide , 2 coat bitumen seal and a minimum pavement thickness of 200 mm . Sealed passing bays are required every 200 metres.

d.      Provision for an internal radial turning path of 12.5 m at the end of the cul de sac.

e.       Cranky Corner Road from the western boundary of the site to the proposed access road to be designed in accordance with Council’s Rural Road Construction standard being an 8 metre wide formation with a 7 metre wide , 2 coat bitumen seal and a minimum pavement thickness of 220 mm .

f.       Cranky Corner Road from the proposed access road to midway along the boundary of proposed Lot 1 be designed in accordance with Council’s Rural Road Construction standard being an 6 metre wide formation with a 4 metre wide, 2 coat bitumen seal and a minimum pavement thickness of 200 mm.

g.       Sediment and erosion controls to be implemented before, during and after construction.

e.      Stormwater Management Plan - provision of a stormwater management plan to serve the proposed subdivision. The stormwater drainage design shall be based on the publication "Australian Rainfall and Runoff" (The Institution of Engineers, 1987) with recurrence intervals as follows -

 

                                      Trunk drainage                                                  1 in 10   year

                                      Bridges and other major structures                   1 in  50   year

                                                Overland flow paths                                           1 in 100  year

 

                   Reason: To ensure that adequate and safe all weather access is available to the                                   development.

             

14.     ACCESS CROSSING - Construct a suitably drained, gravelled and bitumen sealed vehicular access crossing from the edge of the access road to each property boundary, in accordance with Singleton Council's standard for Access to Rural Properties.

 

                   Reason: To ensure the provision of all weather vehicular access to each lot.

 

          15.     CONSTRUCTION OF ENGINEERING WORKS - Construction of all road,                                   stormwater drainage and bulk earthworks associated with the development in                         accordance with the plans to be approved in respect of Condition 12 above.

 

Reason: To ensure that adequate and safe all weather access is available to the                                   development.

 

16.     RESTRICTION ON CONSTRUCTION WORKS - Construction activities on the site being carried out between 7.00 a.m. and 6.00 p.m. Monday to Friday and 8.00 a.m. and 1.00 p.m. Saturday and no work shall be carried out on Sunday or a Public Holiday.  Construction shall not interfere with the amenity of the neighbourhood by reason of noise and/or dust nor interfere with traffic.

 

Reason: To protect the existing amenity of the locality.

 

          17.     SUBMISSION OF PLAN - At the completion of construction works for each                                   subdivision stage, a "works as executed" plan is to be prepared and submitted to                           Council.

 

Reason: To ensure the works have been carried out in accordance with the approved plans.

 

18.     RURAL ADDRESSING – Payment of a fee as set by Singleton Council’s Fees and Charges of fifty dollars per additional lot created for Rural Addressing of the   lot.        This fee is subject to annual adjustment such that the actual contribution    payable is    that fee payable at the date of release of the linen plan of subdivision         or the date of prior payment, whichever occurs first.

 

Reason:  To comply with Council’s adopted fees and charges.

 

19.     VEGETATION REMOVAL - Any vegetation and or trees removed as a        consequence of this approval shall not be burnt on the site. Onsite mulching of the        material is recommended.

 

Reason: To minimise waste and pollution.

 

20.     The applicant shall upgrade Cranky Corner Road from the western boundary of the site for a distance of 470 metres towards Stanhope Road to meet the following specifications:

         

a.         Minimum 80km/h design speed.

b.         Council’s Rural Road Construction standard being an 8 metre wide formation with a 7 metre wide, 2 coat bitumen seal and a minimum pavement thickness of 220mm.

 

                   Reason:  To ensure Cranky Corner Road is upgraded to correspond with the increase in                    traffic generated by the development.

 

21.     The applicant shall make a monetary contribution towards the                                         upgrading of the timber bridge on Cranky Corner Road.  In this regard the                             required contribution has been assessed at $27,000.00.

                  
Reason:  To ensure the existing timber bridge can be upgraded to correspond with                    the increase in traffic generated by the development.

 

    22.     TREE REMOVAL – Mature trees are to be retained wherever possible.

                   Any tree clearing that is necessary to undertake construction work may be                             cleared only during periods of low fauna breeding activity (such as autumn). 

 

                   Prior to clearing any trees an assessment of the occupancy of tree hollows shall           be undertaken. Where necessary, tree hollows shall be vacated and fauna                     relocated to a suitable habitat structure by a suitably experienced ecologist.

 

                   Tree hollows lost due to development on the site shall be replaced with                                   appropriately dimensioned nest boxes in suitable locations at a ratio of 2:1 or                greater.

 

                   Reason: To ensure that existing fauna habitat is protected.

 

          23.     WILDLIFE SIGNS – A road sign shall be installed adjacent to Cranky Corner                       Road near the western boundary of the subject land noting “threatened and                                     endangered woodland birds and nocturnal mammals reside in the locality – please                           drive carefully and protect our native wildlife”. The sign shall be at least 1m x 1m                            and maintained at all times.

 

A separate Development Approval will be required for the sign.

 

Reason: To advise drivers of the resident native wildlife and to protect native wildlife.

 

          24.     ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES – Archaeological sites numbered Stanhope Creek 9,                         15 & 17 in the accompanying Statement of Environmental Effects are to be                                      protected by a buffer. The size of the buffer is to be determined by the nature and                           extent of the site and the buffer must be large enough to protect the site from                                  damage.

 

A “restriction as to user” is to be included advising of the presence of Aboriginal artefacts on the relevant allotments and advising that no development is to occur within the buffer surrounding the artefacts.  

 

                   Reason: To ensure the protection of significant Aboriginal artefacts.

 

          25.     ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES – Should any works be undertaken that are likely to                affect any Aboriginal sites and/or objects a Section 90 Consent Approval under the                NSW National Parks & Wildlife Service Act 1974 is required prior to undertaking                           any such work.

 

Should any Aboriginal objects or sites be located during development on the subject land, the developer is required by law to stop all work and immediately inform the NSW national Parks & Wildlife Service

 

Reason: To advise the applicant of their responsibilities under the s 90 of the NSW National Parks & Wildlife Service Act 1975 and to protect Aboriginal objects and/or sites.

 

26.     FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTIONS – Payment of the following contributions pursuant to Section 94 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and Council’s Section 94 Contributions Plan No. 1.

 

Contributions are subject to annual adjustment such that the actual contributions will be those current at the date of payment.

 

          Community Facilities                                $  8502.00

          Local & Shire Open Space                      $  3354.00

          Rural Roads                                             $22,880.00

          Section 94 Studies                                    $       21.00

 

The payments are to be received by Council prior to the release of the linen plan.

 

 

Reason: To implement Council’s Section 94 Contribution Plan No. 1, a copy of which is available for inspection at Council offices during normal office hours.

 

27.     The Following General Terms of Approval have been submitted by the (NSW Rural Fire Service) and are included as conditions on this approval:-

 

A tank with a capacity of at least 5,000 litres for a dedicated fire fighting supply shall be provided for each dwelling. A 65mm or 38mm Storz fitting and ball or gate valve shall be installed in each tank.

 

Reason: To ensure the requirements of the (NSW Rural Fire Service) are observed.

 

28.     EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL – All work undertaken in association with this application shall comply with the requirements of Council’s Erosion and Sediment Control Development Control Plan. It is the proponent’s responsibility to ensure that all contractors and sub-contractors comply with this requirement.

 

Reason: To prevent the land from being degraded, to protect waterways from being degraded and to promote and protect biodiversity.

 

29.     ELECTRICITY – The submission of documentary evidence from Energy Australia that satisfactory arrangements have been made for:

·       The provision of easements in favour of Energy Australia over private land for existing and proposed power lines and where the development requires the relocation of power lines or other assets of Energy Australia.

·       The provision of a grid based overhead electricity supply to each of the resultant lots of the subdivision.

 

Reason: To ensure the provision of power to each resultant lot in accordance with Council policy.

 

         

 

 

 

 

 

Attachments

AT-1 View

Locality Plan

1 page(s)

AT-2 View

Proposed Subdivision Plan

1 page(s)

AT-3 View

Letter for NSW Department of Primary Industries

2 page(s)

AT-4 View

Letter Jall Projects

2 page(s)

AT-5 View

Archaeological Risk Assessment Plan

1 page(s)

AT-6 View

S1 - Objection Letter

1 page(s)

AT-7 View

S2 - Objection Letter

1 page(s)

AT-8 View

S3 - Objection Letter

1 page(s)

AT-9 View

S4 - Objection Letter

1 page(s)

 


Attachment 1

Manager Planning & Development Report No. 11/04

Locality Plan

Subdivision - 14 Allotments

 

 

 


Attachment 2

Manager Planning & Development Report No. 11/04

Proposed Subdivision Plan

Subdivision - 14 Allotments

 

 

 


Attachment 3

Manager Planning & Development Report No. 11/04

Letter for NSW Department of Primary Industries

Subdivision - 14 Allotments

 

 

 


 


Attachment 4

Manager Planning & Development Report No. 11/04

Letter Jall Projects

Subdivision - 14 Allotments

 

 

 


 


Attachment 5

Manager Planning & Development Report No. 11/04

Archaeological Risk Assessment Plan

Subdivision - 14 Allotments

 

 

 


Attachment 6

Manager Planning & Development Report No. 11/04

S1 - Objection Letter

Subdivision - 14 Allotments

 

 

 


Attachment 7

Manager Planning & Development Report No. 11/04

S2 - Objection Letter

Subdivision - 14 Allotments

 

 

 


Attachment 8

Manager Planning & Development Report No. 11/04

S3 - Objection Letter

Subdivision - 14 Allotments

 

 

 


Attachment 9

Manager Planning & Development Report No. 11/04

S4 - Objection Letter

Subdivision - 14 Allotments

 

 

 


SINGLETON COUNCIL  Minutes_Item

Meeting of the Corporate and Development Services Committee - 13 September 2004

 

 

 

Manager Planning & Development Report No. 10/04

 

 

 

6.

WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM

Author: Brian Thomas        

FILE: 01/0161

 

Monthly report for August 2004.

 

Samples are taken from the Hunter River, Wollombi Brook, Glendon Brook and Black Creek each month, usually on the second Tuesday, and analysed at the Hunter Water Laboratories at Warabrook in Newcastle.

 

Results of five (5) sites are published in the Argus each month with the use of icons, and stars to demonstrate the quality of the water on sample day.  These publications are to raise community awareness about the quality of the waterways and should be taken as an indication only due to the fluctuations that can occur over short periods.  Stars are used to indicate quality with good results receiving 4 stars and poor results receiving 1 star.

 

The comparison information in the table below is used to determine how many stars a particular use should receive.  Total Phosphorous is not recorded in the Argus publication.

 

Comparison Information for Water Quality Advertisement

Result Ratings

 

 

 

 

Parameter measured

Good ::::

Moderate :::

Fair ::

Poor :

Turbidity (ntu)

<5

5-25

25-50

>50

Salinity (

<280

280-800

800-1500

>1500

Faecal coliforms (cfu/100ml)

Less than 150

n/a

150-1000

>1000

 

The report in the Argus contains icons which are an indication of water use suitability. For example if the faecal coliforms levels are less than 150/100ml a swimming icon will be displayed indicating that the water was fit for swimming.  If the level is 150ml or greater the icon will not appear.

 

Results for August 2004

Sample Site

Turbidity

Conductivity

Total Phosphorus

Faecal Coliforms

Wollombi Brook

Warkworth

3.4                                

1450

0.01

3

Hunter River

Moses Crossing

4.0       

677      

0.02

3

Hunter River

Elderslie

3.6

860

0.02

63

Glendon Brook

Mitchells Flat

6.8

1340

0.02

18

Hunter River

Singleton

8.6

766

0.02

20

Black Creek

Branxton

3.7

1640

0.03

23

 

 

FOR COUNCIL’S INFORMATION

 

 

Attachments

AT-1 View

Water Quality Monitoring Program - August

1 page(s)

 


Attachment 1

Manager Planning & Development Report No. 11/04

Water Quality Monitoring Program - August

WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM

 

 

 


SINGLETON COUNCIL  Minutes_Item

Meeting of the Corporate and Development Services Committee - 13 September 2004

 

 

 

Manager Planning & Development Report No. 10/04

 

 

 

7.

United Coal Mine CCC

Author: Brian Thomas        

FILE: 03-0286

 

 

Executive Summary

 

The Development Consent for United Coal Mine, issued by the Minister assisting the Minister for Infrastructure & Planning, requires the establishment of a Community Consultative Committee.  The committee will oversee the environmental performance of the development.

 

Notices were placed in the Singleton Argus and Hunter Valley News seeking nominations from the public to fill the two community representative positions.  Council did not receive any response to these notices.  The Mine then letterbox dropped the local area resulting in nominations from Laurie Kelly of Warkworth & Helen Holz of Jerry’s Plains.

 

Copies of their nomination letters are provided to Councillors under separate cover.  Council will need to make an appointment so that the committee can be formed.

 

 

 

RECOMMENDED

 

1.       That Council appoint Mr Kelly & Mrs Holz to represent the Community on the United Mine           Community Consultative Committee.

 

2.       That Council appoint a Councillor to the position of Chairperson of the Committee.

 

 

 

Attachments

There are no attachments for this report.


  Minutes_Item

8.

Minutes of Glennies Creek Community Consultative Committee

Author: Brian Thomas        

FILE: 01/0282

 

 

 

 

A special meeting of the Glennies Creek Colliery Community Consultative Committee was held on 16 June 2004.

 

The minutes of the meeting are appended to this report as an attachment.

 

 

FOR COUNCIL’S INFORMATION

 

 

Attachments

AT-1 View

Minutes of Glennies Creek Colliery Community Consultative Committee Meeting

2 page(s)

 


Attachment 1

Manager Planning & Development Report No. 11/04

Minutes of Glennies Creek Colliery Community Consultative Commitee Meeting

Minutes of Glennies Creek Community Consultative Committee

 

 

 


 


SINGLETON COUNCIL  Minutes_Item

Meeting of the Corporate and Development Services Committee - 13 September 2004

 

 

 

Manager Planning & Development Report No. 10/04

 

 

 

9.

Hunter Valley Operations CCC

Author: Brian Thomas        

FILE: 03/0047

 

 

The four monthly meeting of the Hunter Valley Operations Community Consultative Committee was held on 17 June 2004.  The minutes of the meeting are appended to this report as an attachment.

 

 

FOR COUNCIL’S INFORMATION

 

 

Attachments

AT-1 View

Minutes of Hunter Valley Operations Community Consultative Committee meeting

3 page(s)

 


Attachment 1

Manager Planning & Development Report No. 11/04

Minutes of Hunter Valley Operations Community Consultative Committee meeting

Hunter Valley Operations CCC

 

 

 



 


SINGLETON COUNCIL  Minutes_Item

Meeting of the Corporate and Development Services Committee - 13 September 2004

 

 

 

Manager Planning & Development Report No. 10/04

 

 

 

10.

Camberwell Coal Community Consultative Committee

Author: Brian Thomas        

FILE: 02/0063

 

 

Detail

 

 

 

The six monthly meeting of the Camberwell Coal Mine Community Consultative Committee was held on 15 June 2004.

 

The minutes of the meeting are appended to this report as an attachment.

 

 

FOR COUNCIL’S INFORMATION

 

 

Attachments

AT-1 View

Minutes of Camberwell Coal Community Consultative Committee Meeting

3 page(s)

 


Attachment 1

Manager Planning & Development Report No. 11/04

Minutes of Camberwell Coal Community Consultative Committee Meeting

Camberwell Coal Community Consultative Committee

 

 

 


 


SINGLETON COUNCIL  Minutes_Item

Meeting of the Corporate and Development Services Committee - 13 September 2004

 

 

 

Manager Planning & Development Report No. 10/04

 

 

 

11.

Minutes of Liddell Coal Mine Community Consultative Committee Meeting

Author: Brian Thomas        

FILE: 02/0340

 

 

 

 

The six monthly meeting of the Liddell Coal Community Consultative Committee was held on 1st June 2004.  The minutes of the meeting are appended to this report as an attachment.

 

 

FOR COUNCIL’S INFORMATION

 

 

Attachments

AT-1 View

Minutes of Liddell Coal Mine Community Consultative Committee Meeting

3 page(s)

 


Attachment 1

Manager Planning & Development Report No. 11/04

Minutes of Liddell Coal Mine Community Consultative Committee Meeting

Minutes of Liddell Coal Mine Community Consultative Committee Meeting

 

 

 


 


SINGLETON COUNCIL  Minutes_Item

Meeting of the Corporate and Development Services Committee - 13 September 2004

 

 

 

Manager Planning & Development Report No. 10/04

 

 

 

12.

Minutes of Ashton Coal Mine Community Consultative Committee Meeting

Author: Brian Thomas        

FILE: 03/0051

 

 

The four monthly meeting of the Ashton Mine Community Consultative Committee was held on 29 June 2004.  The minutes of the meeting are appended to this report as an Attachment.

 

 

FOR COUNCIL’S INFORMATION

 

 

Attachments

AT-1 View

Minutes of Ashton Coal Mine Community Consultative Committee Meeting

3 page(s)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

M Ihlein                                                                    K S McMurray

Manager Planning & Development Services         Director Corporate & Development Services


Attachment 1

Manager Planning & Development Report No. 11/04

Minutes of Ashton Coal Mine Community Consultative Committee Meeting

Minutes of Ashton Coal Mine Community Consultative Committee Meeting