
NOTICE OF MEETING
Notice is hereby
given, in accordance with the provisions of the Local Government Act 1993 that
a Meeting of the Corporate and
Development Services Committee will be held in the Council Chambers,
AGENDA PAGE
Apologies
Confirmation of Minutes
1. Corporate and
Development Services Committee
Mayoral Minute
Disclosures
and Declarations of Interest
Withdrawal
of Items and Late Items of Business
Presentations
Ashton
Coal Operations Pty Limited
Public
Access Session
General Manager's Report No. 14/04
1. Upper
- Northern Hunter Regional Environmental Management Strategy.............................. 5
Economic Development Officers
Report No. 6/04
1. Economic
Development....................................................................................................... 9
Director
Corporate and Development Services Report No. 23/04
1. 2003/2004
Annual Financial Reports................................................................................. 11
Manager Planning
& Development Report No. 10/04
1. Road
Naming of
2.
3. Rural
Residential Development Strategy - Steering Committee............................................ 27
4. Questions
Without Notice.................................................................................................. 28
5. Subdivision
- 14 Allotments............................................................................................... 29
6. Water
Quality Monitoring Program.................................................................................... 65
7. United
Coal Mine CCC..................................................................................................... 67
8. Minutes
of Glennies Creek Community Consultative Committee......................................... 68
9.
10..... Camberwell Coal Community Consultative Committee.................................................. 77
11..... Minutes of Liddell Coal Mine Community Consultative
Committee Meeting................... 82
12..... Minutes of Ashton Coal Mine Community Consultative
Committee Meeting................... 87
Questions
Without Notice
…………………………………………..
GENERAL
MANAGER
Singleton
Council’s Vision Statement is:
“Singleton. A progressive
community of excellence and sustainability”
Singleton
Council’s Mission Statement is:
“To provide quality services to the community in an
efficient and friendly manner encouraging responsible development”
Singleton
Council’s Core Values are:
|
|
Value |
Definition |
|
· |
Service |
Putting the needs of customers first and achieving
excellence in customer service; |
|
· |
Consistency |
Having a professional approach to work with the
highest ethical standards and a businesslike manner across the organisation; |
|
· |
Focus |
Maintaining a clear focus on the vision and agreed
goals; |
|
· |
Respect |
Earning and retaining the respect of the community; |
|
· |
Pride |
General pride in works and services; |
|
· |
Communication |
Excellence in communications; |
|
· |
Achievement |
Developing a well trained, motivated and focussed
staff and elected Council; |
|
· |
Equity |
Being a fair and equitable employer and provider of
services; |
|
· |
Reliance |
Ensuring that the community, elected Council and
staff can rely upon each other; |
|
· |
Commitment |
Displaying commitment and cohesion between
community, elected members and staff; |
|
· |
Efficiency |
Services provided by the organisation are to be
carried out with the efficient allocation of resources; |

COUNCIL POLICY
Pecuniary
and Conflict of Interest Issues
Council adopted the following policies on
|
· Code of Conduct · Conflict of Interest |
These policies provide details of
statutory requirements and give guidance in respect of the way in which
pecuniary and conflict of interest issues should be approached.
Generally, the policies refer to the
following issues:
1. Councillors
are under an obligation at law to disclose any interest they may have in any
matter before the Council and to refrain from being involved in any
consideration or to vote on any such matter.
2. Councillors
must disclose any interest in any matter noted in the business paper prior to
or at the opening of the meeting.
3. The
nature of the interest shall be included in the notification.
4. Councillors
shall immediately and during the meeting disclose any interest in respect of
any matter arising during the meeting which is not referred to in the business
paper.
5. All
declarations of interest shall be recorded by the General Manager.
6. All
disclosures of interest shall as far as is practicable be given in writing.
7. Any
member having an interest shall leave the meeting and remain absent while the
subject of the interest is being considered by Council.
8. The
meeting shall not discuss any matter in which a councillor has an interest
while the councillor is present at the meeting.
|
SINGLETON
COUNCIL Minutes_Item |
Meeting of the Corporate and Development Services Committee - 13 September 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
General
Manager's Report No. 14/04 |
|
|
|
|
1. |
Upper -
Northern Hunter Regional Environmental Management Strategy Author: Steve
McGrath |
FILE: 01-0509 |
|
Executive
Summary Councillors will recall that at the Council Meeting following the election of the new Council in March, 2004, Councillors were nominated and subsequently appointed to a variety of Committees and Organisations on which Council is represented. One Committee that was not considered was the Upper – Northern Hunter Regional Environmental Management Strategy. Councillors may recall that this was intentionally deferred at the time as the Board of Hunter Councils Inc. was undertaking a process of rationalising the operations of this Committee and the equivalent body within the Lower Hunter. This process has now been concluded and a copy of an item of correspondence from Hunter Councils Inc. is attached to this report for Councillors perusal. Part 1 of the letter deals with matters impacting on the Lower Hunter and Central Coast REMS Steering Committee which has no impact on Singleton Council. Part 2 of the letter deals with the appointment of the members to the Hunter Central Coast REMS Steering Committees and in this regard the correspondence suggests that Member Councils each nominate two representatives (one Councillor and one professional officer) to the relevant Steering Committee to provide strategic guidance to HCC REMS Projects and Programs. One of the attachments to the correspondence from Hunter Councils Inc. makes reference to the roles and responsibilities of the HCC REMS Steering Committees. Council’s Manager Planning & Development Services is the Council officer who has been authorised to attend the Upper Northern Hunter REMS Steering Committee. It is now necessary for Council to appoint a Councillor representative to the Upper Northern Hunter REMS Steering Committee. |
|
RECOMMENDED that
Council nominate a Councillor for appointment to the Upper – Northern Hunter
REMS Steering Committee. |
|
AT-1 View |
Upper - Northern Hunter REMS |
3 page(s) |
Steve McGrath
General Manager
|
General Manager's Report No. 14/04 |
|
|
Upper - Northern Hunter REMS |
Upper - Northern Hunter Regional Environmental
Management Strategy |
|
|
|


|
SINGLETON
COUNCIL |
Meeting of the Corporate and Development Services Committee - 13 September 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
Economic
Development Officer’s Report No. 6/04 |
|
|
|
|
1. Minutes_Item |
Economic
Development Author: Don
Gray |
FILE: 02/0028 |
|
During the months of July and August 2004
Councils Economic Development Officer
( |
1.1 Inquiries
Property Inquiries (Apart from Country Week)
· Industrial 11
· Commercial 5
· Residential 3
General Inquiries
· Familiarisation tours 1
· Statistical Inquiries 9
1.2 Meetings
Coal Awareness Days
The traditional Coal Discussion Day will this year be replaced by a two day event to be
known as Coal Awareness Days.
On the afternoon of Friday 29 October proceedings will be opened by the Minister for Minerals and Energy the Hon. Kerry Hickey MP. This session will consist of two speakers and a forum to discuss the sustainability of the mining industry.
On Saturday 30 October mine site tours will be conducted for the public.
Towns and Villages Futures Program (TVFP)
On
Plan for the local communities was produced.
Five key initiatives (in order of priority) that were identified were:
· Brand for the whole region
· Visitor Information Centre
· Combined newsletter
· Improved access to national parks
· Arrest or reverse Wollombi Brook degradation
As a result of
these findings an application for a second round of funding for “Branding and Marketing” the region has been submitted
under the same program. This application had to be submitted by
Singleton Development Support Team (SDST)
The SDST has undertaken as survey of 420 businesses to establish the skills shortage and training needs of businesses in the LGA.
120 responses have been received and a further report will be issued on the results.
Country Week
Councils
Interest
in move out of
2.0 Statistical Data
A review of development applications received by Councils for the first six months of 2004 is shown below:
January to March 2004 (Value in $1000 of
applications)
Residential $15132
Industrial $ 733
Commercial $476
Infrastructure $942
Tourism $1502
Mining/Power $132
Housing applications 67
April to June 2004
Residential $13832
Industrial $315
Commercial $1740
Infrastructure $10626
Tourism $104
Housing applications 64
|
|
There are no attachments for this report.
Don
Gray K
Economic
Development Officer Director
Corporate & Development Services
|
1. |
2003/2004
Annual Financial Reports Author: Anthony
Egan |
FILE: |
|
Executive
Summary To present details of the Draft Annual Reports to Council for adoption and referral for audit. |
Background:
Annually Council is required to refer the Annual Financial Reports for audit.
Management Plan:
The 2003/2004 Annual Financial Reports represents Council Financial performance for the 2003/2004 Financial Year which formed part of Council’s adopted 2003/2004 Management Plan.
Council Policy: N/A
Legislation:
Section 413, 415 and 416 of the Local Government Act 1993 requires
that the Council’s General Purpose and Special Purpose Annual Financial Reports
for 2003/2004 to be prepared, referred to audit and audited by
In regards to this process, Council is required to authorise the referral of the Financial Reports to Council’s Auditor. In addition, Section 413 (2)(c), requires that Council provide a statement as to its opinion on the annual financial statements of account. This statement must be made by resolution of the Council and signed by the Mayor, at least one other Councillor, the General Manager and the Responsible Accounting Officer (Manager Finance), in accordance with the Local Government (Financial Management) Regulations 1999.
Sustainability:
Social:
N/A
Environmental: N/A
Financial: The financial result for 2003/2004 is shown on the Statement of Financial Performance which indicates a surplus from all activities of $14,524,000. Incorporated in this result is the identification of $2,983,000 from developers being the valuation of infrastructure assets that have been dedicated to Council during the 2003/2004 financial year.
The result before capital amounts shows a surplus of $7,930,000 which includes a depreciation expense of $6,585,000.
The 2003/2004 Financial Reports disclose a land development profit of $8,405,000 following the sale of 97 lots. This result represents an increase of $6,621,000 from the previous financial year.
Note 13 to the Financial Statements details Council's key financial
indicators. The Current Ratio indicates the adequacy of working capital and the
ability to satisfy obligations in the short term for the consolidated entity.
The consolidated Current Ratio stands at 3.07 as at
The Unrestricted Current Ratio assesses the adequacy of working
capital and the ability to satisfy obligations in the short term for the
unrestricted activities of Council. This ratio has decreased to 2.84 as at
Council will be more aware of the Debt Service Ratio which assesses the degree to which revenues are committed to the repayment of debt. This ratio for the consolidated entity stands at 2.62%.
The Rate Coverage Ratio indicates the proportion of rate income to
total income received for the financial year.
This indicator provides a good representation of Council's reliance on
rate income to offset expenditure. As at
The
The financial indicators referred to in this report have been incorporated in Attachment A for quick reference.
Consultation: N/A
Risk Management: N/A
Options:
Council is required by legislation to refer the Annual Financial Reports for Audit. Accordingly there is no other option than to adopt the recommendation.
Conclusions:
A further report will be presented to Council’s Ordinary Meeting to
be held on
|
That in accordance with the provisions of Section 413 (2)(c) of the Local Government Act 1993 (as amended) and the Financial Management Regulations, in Council's opinion: a) the Council's Annual Financial Report has been prepared in accordance with; (i) the Local Government Act 1993 (as amended) and Regulations, and (ii) the Statement of Accounting Concepts, and (iii) the Local Government Code of Accounting Practice and Financial Reporting, and (iv) the Local Government Asset Accounting Manual, and (v) the Australian Accounting Standards. the reports present fairly the Council's financial position and operating result for the year, and the reports accord with the Council's accounting and other records, and we are not aware of anything that would make the reports false or misleading in any way. b) That the Special Purpose Financial Reports have been drawn up in accordance with the Local Government Code of Accounting Practice and Financial Reporting. c) That the General and Special Purpose Financial Reports be certified by the Mayor, Deputy Mayor, General Manager and Responsible Accounting Officer (Manager Finance). d) That
Council approves the Annual Financial Statements of Accounts (including
General Purpose and Special Purpose Reports) for the year ending |
|
AT-1 View |
Statement of Performance Measure |
1 page(s) |
K
Director
Corporate & Development Services
|
Director Corporate and Development Services Report
No. 23/04 |
|
|
Statement of Performance Measure |
2003/2004 Annual Financial Reports |
|
|
|

|
SINGLETON
COUNCIL Minutes_Item |
Meeting of the Corporate and Development Services Committee - 13 September 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Planning & Development Report No. 10/04 |
|
|
|
|
1. |
ROAD NAMING
OF Author: Mark
Ihlein |
FILE: SA 29/1994 |
|
Applicant: Mrs M J Tolmie Owner: Mrs M J Tolmie Land and Location: Lot 1 DP 867984, Zoning: Rural 1(d)
Small Holdings Proposal: Road Naming Date of Application: Responsible Officer: Craig Maher Executive
Summary N/A |
Proposal
Council is currently in receipt of an
application for the naming of a new subdivision road off
The applicant has submitted three names to be considered, and advised that the preferred name for the road is “Wilhannah Close”.
Wilhannah recognizes the applicant’s first Australian Ancestors, William and Hannah Singleton. The chosen name is not included on Council’s list of possible road names however, given the historical significance the name is considered to have merit.
The road name selected is not currently in use within the Shire, and is therefore recommended for adoption as the road name for this new subdivision road.
History
Council approved a staged eleven (11) lot
subdivision for Mr A & Mrs M J Tolmie on
Site Characteristics
The proposed access road is currently being
constructed directly off
Statutory Considerations
N/A
Sustainability:
Social N/A
Environmental NA
Financial NA
Conclusions
The chosen road name is acceptable and should be adopted
|
That Council pursuant to Section 162 of
the Roads Act, 1993 and the Roads (General) Regulation, 2000, adopt the name
Wilhannah Close as the name of the new subdivision road off |
|
|
|
|
AT-1 View |
Locality Plan |
1 page(s) |
|
AT-2 View |
Subdivision Plan |
1 page(s) |
|
Manager Planning & Development Report No. 11/04 |
|
|
Locality Plan |
ROAD NAMING OF SUBDIVISION ROAD |
|
|
|

|
Manager Planning & Development Report No. 11/04 |
|
|
Subdivision Plan |
ROAD NAMING OF SUBDIVISION ROAD |
|
|
|

|
SINGLETON COUNCIL Minutes_Item |
Meeting of the Corporate and Development Services Committee - 13 September 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Planning & Development Report No. 10/04 |
|
|
|
|
2. |
Author: Mark
Ihlein |
FILE: 00/0190 |
|
Executive Summary Council has requested the NSPC-CCC to determine whether or not the Committee should be dissolved. |
A meeting of the NSPC-CCC was held on
Consideration of the item resulted from a request of Council to ask the
committee to determine whether it should be dissolved.
The general consensus of the meeting was to disband the consultative
committee. However, it was agreed that
the absent member of the committee should be consulted, Mr Steve Thornton, and
his views sought. A copy of the
correspondence forwarded to Mr Thornton is attached.
As no written response was received the Manager Planning and Development
Services spoke with Mr Thornton via telephone who advised he had no objection
provided there was implementation of an appropriate process to deal with
complaints and the committee can be reactivated at the request of either the
NSPC or community representation.
Council has an existing complaints management system where customer
action requests are logged and forwarded to an appropriate officer for
investigation. Alternatively complaints may be made in writing to the General
Manager which are forwarded to an officer for action.
|
1. That the Newcastle Sports Parachute Club Community Consultative Committee be dissolved. 2. The Committee be
reactivated at the request of either the Newcastle Sports Parachute Club or
community representation. |
|
AT-1 View |
Draft Minutes - |
1 page(s) |
|
AT-2 View |
Letter to |
1 page(s) |
|
Manager Planning & Development Report No. 11/04 |
|
|
Draft Minutes - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE NSPC COMMUNITY
CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE MEETING
ATTENDANCE Mayor Cr F Harvison, P Maguire, M Roser, M Ihlein, 2 club reps
APOLOGISE
OPENING Mayor
Harvison – Chairman of the NSPC CCC opened the
ADDRESS meeting
at
BUSINESS ARISING
§ Chairmans function 2003 and Function 2004
§ Details on effluent system approved clarification as to what was submitted.
§ Discussion on noise testing of air craft. Air services Aust comment on testing. Air Services letter to PM.
§ Suggestion to include additional data in any noise test results.
§ Committee reps policy requires min 2 and max 4 for club and community.
§ Issue raised about community reps living within the area.
§ No additional matters to do with the club.
§ Paul asked for an explanation on function weekends which was provided.
§ Fred discussed previous report and subsequent Council resolution on dissolving of the CCC.
§ Decision not to undertake vote to dissolve CCC as ST was not aware of this and it would be unfair to conduct a vote without knowledge of all members of this occurring. The general consensus was however to disband the CCC subject to advice from Steve Thornton.
§ Flights per operating day.
§ Operating weekends per month.
§ Noise from functions.
§ PM concerns regarding the ability to monitor plane noise.
§ To include Council report and resolution to all committee members.
§ ST through MR to remind the club on no-flying weekend.
§ MI asked the committee to thank MR on his involvement in the CCC.
Closed Meeting –
02 6578 7330
Our
Ref: PN 00190
Mr Steve Thornton
MAITLAND NSW 2320
It is advised a
meeting of the NSPC CCC was held on
The general consensus of the meeting was to disband the NSPC CCC, however it was agreed that prior to any formal resolution in this regard, you should be consulted as one of the community representatives and your views sought.
Should the CCC be disbanded, the meeting agreed that it would be subject to implementation of an appropriate process to deal with complaints and the committee can be reactivated at the request of either the NSPC or community representation.
It would be
appreciated if you could provide your comments directly to the undersigned
either in writing or verbally by
Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned should you require further clarification or wish to otherwise discuss the matter.
Mark Ihlein
Manager –
MI.jjg
CC Clr
Harvison, Mayor – Singleton Council,
Mr
Paul Maguire,
NSPC,
|
SINGLETON COUNCIL Minutes_Item |
Meeting of the Corporate and Development Services Committee - 13 September 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Planning & Development Report No. 10/04 |
|
|
|
|
3. |
RURAL
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY - STEERING COMMITTEE Author: Mark
Ihlein |
FILE: 01/0059 |
|
|
Council will be aware that the Rural Residential Development Strategy
has been under preparation for some considerable time. Most of the delays in the process are a
result of addressing issues raised by the National Parks and Wildlife Service
in respect of biodiversity and Aboriginal archaeological issues.
Council officers have now received the Strategy report from the
consultants which is currently being reviewed.
It is envisaged that during October the steering committee will need to
be briefed and a detailed report subsequently presented to Council with a view
to public exhibition.
The Councillor representation on the steering committee was former
Councillor Golenia, and Councillor Urpeth, and Councillor McNamara. It is now timely for Council to re-elect
representatives to the committee. Given that the strategy will apply to the
rural areas it is suggested that the four rural Councillors be elected.
The other members of the original steering committee were; Garry Hamblin
– Surveyor, Murray Shaddock – Real Estate, Barry Russell – Landcare
Co-ordinator, Kay Stacy – NSW Farmers Council, Keith Lobb – Rural Fire Service,
Jo-Anne Adam – Rural Resident and Sue Moore – Resident.
It is proposed to write to each of the members to gauge their interest
in participating in a briefing session during October.
|
That the four
rural Councillors be elected as Councils representatives for the Rural
Residential Development Strategy Steering Committee. |
There are no attachments for this report.
|
SINGLETON COUNCIL Minutes_Item |
Meeting of the Corporate and Development Services Committee - 13 September 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Planning & Development Report No. 10/04 |
|
|
|
|
4. |
QUESTIONS
WITHOUT NOTICE Author: Mark
Ihlein |
FILE: 01/0450 |
|
|
Q143/04 - Clr MacBain
Seeking clarification as to the difference between subdivisions
resulting from Parish Portions compared with Torrens Title.
To fully answer this question the issue of dwelling entitlement and
subdivision need to be addressed in respect of Parish Portions and Torrens
Title lots.
Parish Portions
This is a form of “old system” title which can be transferred to
different owners without the need for any Council approval. Within the 1 Rural
Zone a dwelling can only be erected on land greater than 40 hectares or on an
allotment of land with an area of less than 40 hectares where the land is an
allotment created prior to 7th January, 1966 and comprises the whole
of an existing holding.
There is a 40 hectare minimum subdivision provision and some limited
concessional lot entitlements, where an existing holding has an area of not
less than 10 hectares.
These are also sometime referred to as new systems title and are
represented as a lot and DP. The
dwelling entitlement and subdivision provisions are the same as for Parish
Portions.
|
|
There are no attachments for this report.
|
SINGLETON COUNCIL Minutes_Item |
Meeting of the Corporate and Development Services Committee - 13 September 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Planning & Development Report No. 10/04 |
|
|
|
|
5. |
Subdivision -
14 Allotments Author: Erica
Duffy |
FILE: SA 39/2004 (DA 381/2004) |
|
Applicant: Jall Projects Owner: Stannic Securities Pty Ltd Land and Location: Zoning: Rural 1(a) Proposal: To subdivide the land into fourteen (14) allotments Date of Application: Responsible Officer: Erica Duffy Executive Summary The applicant is requesting Council
approval to subdivide a 528Ha lot into 13 x 40Ha allotments and a 1 x 4.5ha
concessional allotment. The subject land has been used as a grazing and beef
cattle stud. The application includes the construction of a new road
providing access to 10 of the proposed allotments as well as an upgrading of The application is forwarded to Council
for determination as there were objections to the proposal. The objections
raised related to the condition of The report concludes with the
recommendation that the application be approved subject to the conditions
listed which will mitigate possible adverse impacts from proposal. The
approval is recommended as a deferred commencement pending the submission of
a flood study which will provide Council with the extent of works necessary
to ensure the existing timber bridge on |
Proposal
This application is for the subdivision of a 528Ha allotment into 13 x 40Ha allotments and a 1 x 4.5Ha concessional allotment.
History
The subject land was created by a subdivision approved by Council in 1963. The land has owned by the same family for the last 40 years and run in conjunction with other adjoining land as a grazing and beef cattle stud.
Site
Characteristics
The subject land is located on either side
of
A copy of the proposed subdivision,
overlayed on a topographic map, is appended to the report as Attachment “2”.
Statutory
Considerations
(a) the
provision of:
(i) Any
environmental planning instrument.
EP&A Act
Under s91(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the proposal is Integrated Development requiring response from the NSW Rural Fire Service(RFS). The response from the RFS included one General Terms of Approval which has been included in the conditions.
Hunter Regional Environmental Plan
Under the provisions of Cl.27 of the Hunter Regional Environmental Plan 1989 (HREP), the concurrence of the Director-General of the Department of Agriculture is required prior to subdivision of prime crop and pasture land (Class 1, 2 or 3). Council’s maps show part of the subject land is Class 3 and part is Class 4. Council’s agriculture map does not show all the subject land, however it appears that the prime pasture land (Class 3p land) includes the land adjacent to Stanhope Creek which runs through the subject land. Class 3 is defined as “Land not suitable to regular cultivation. Includes some arable and some pasture lands with moderate levels of agricultural production. Well suited to pasture improvement and can be cultivated for an occasional crop”. The suffix “p” is for pastures.
It appears from Council’s maps that the ridge which runs approximately east-west on the subject land is classified as Class 4 land. Class 4 is defined as “Land not suited for cultivation. Poor grazing or lands with seasonal grazing capabilities. Overall level of production is low.”
The concurrence of the NSW Department of Primary Industries (DPI) was sought for the proposal and their response is appended to the report as Attachment “3”.
The applicants response to the DPI submission has been appended to this report as Attachment “4”. Council officers conclude that while it may be regrettable that large, previously economically viable agricultural holdings are subdivided, this is a reflection of the economic value of land generally and is not isolated to this area, Singleton LGA or the Hunter Region.
Under the provisions of Singleton Local Environmental Plan 1996, the 1(a) Rural zone objectives are:
(a) to protect and conserve agricultural land and to encourage
continuing viable and sustainable agricultural land use;
(b) to promote the protection and preservation
of natural ecological systems and processes;
(c) to maintain the scenic amenity and landscape
quality of the area;
(d) to provide for the proper and co-ordinated
use of rivers and water catchments;
(e) to promote provision of roads that are
compatible with the nature and intensity of development and the character of
the area.
On balance it is considered that the proposal is consistent with the zone objective contained within the SLEP.
Singleton Local Environmental Plan
Under the provisions of Cl. 7(1)(a) of the Singleton Local Environmental Plan 1996 (SLEP), the minimum lot size for land zoned Rural 1(a) and with dwelling entitlement is 40 Ha. Under the provisions of Cl. 17(1)(c) and through a search of Council records one concessional allotment is permissible.
The proposal to
create 13 x 40ha lots and 1 x 4.5ha lots is permissible.
(ii) Any draft
environmental planning instrument that is or has been placed on public
exhibition and details of which have been notified to the consent authority.
No such document applies to the proposal or land.
(iii) Any
development control plan.
No development control plan applies to the proposal.
(iv) Any
matters prescribed by the regulations, that apply to the land to which the
development application relates.
No such matters apply to this land.
(b) The likely impact of that development, including environmental
impacts on both the natural and built environments, and social and economic
impacts in the locality.
Context & Setting
Land to the
north of the subject land is a grazing property which contains a dwelling. Land
further north, off
The dominant feature of the landscape is the steep and vegetated ridges north of the subject land which contrasts with the cleared, undulating and rolling hills of the subject land and surrounding lands. The area is characterised by scattered dwellings associated with rural grazing properties.
It is considered that the proposed development is not inconsistent with the surrounding land uses.
Access & Transport
The primary
means of access to the proposed subdivision is via a new subdivision road which
follows the main ridgeline that runs in an easterly direction through the site.
The proposed road is approximately 2.2 kilometres long with a cul de sac at its
extremity. This road intersects with
The proposal
will result in an additional 126 vehicles per day (VPD) utilising Cranky Corner
and Stanhope Roads. Stanhope Road is sealed, in good condition and considered
of sufficient width to handle the additional traffic loading generated by this
subdivision. As mentioned above
The applicant has undertaken an analysis of the lots currently
served by
Therefore, the additional 14 lots created by this subdivision
represent a net increase in vehicle movements on
Road Standards:
New
·
· From the eastern
boundary of proposed
Cranky
· From the western boundary of the subject land to the intersection of the proposed subdivision road – 7 metre seal on 8 metre formation.
· From the
intersection of the proposed road to midway along the boundary of proposed
All of the above road requirements will be reflected as conditions of consent.
Utilities
Overhead power is currently available to the subject land. Council will require the applicant to provide documentary evidence from the electricity supplier that provisions have been made for power supply to each proposed allotment. A condition has been included requiring this.
A Council approved On Site Sewerage Management Systems (OSSMS) will be required for dwellings on each of the proposed lots. The applicant advises that consultant geotechnical engineers and scientists concluded that effluent from future residents of the subdivision could be safely disposed of within the potential building envelopes for each of the proposed vacant allotments. Various methods for on-site treatment will be able to be utilised given the size of the allotments, soil types and distances to streams and watercourses.
Potable water
will be obtained by the collection and storage of roof water in appropriately
sized tanks. A postal service, school bus and a garbage collection service is
available at the intersection of
Heritage
An archaeological
assessment was undertaken with local aboriginal community organisations
including Mindaribba Local Aboriginal Land Council,
The report concluded with the following recommendations:
· The study area is considered to have Aboriginal heritage potential.
· The above conclusion is reached based on Aboriginal consultation and advice, background archaeological/historical research, field assessment and land-use history.
· Several Aboriginal sites recorded (ie Stanhope Creek 9,15 & 17) are considered to be of medium-high archaeological significance due to their undisturbed nature, contents and location. Buffer zones will be required to be placed around these sites to prevent further disturbance. Attachment “5” notes the location of these sites.
· The remaining seven sites and nine isolated finds are considered to be of low archaeological significance, due to their physical condition and the potential for insitu cultural material to be found in association with them.
· In order for the sub-division proposal to proceed without delay; sites and artefacts that have been recorded would need to be conserved. As most of the building and construction is associated with flat dry ground, it is unlikely that any of the artefacts recorded will be disturbed as a result of development impacts.
· If the development impacts were likely to affect existing Aboriginal Sites and Objects, the sub-division proposal would be required to seek Section 90 Consent Approval under the NSW National Parks & Wildlife Service Act 1974. This would require additional archaeological assessment work and may delay project construction for up to 8 weeks.
· If as a result of any future development on the land, Aboriginal objects or sites are located, the developer is required by law to stop all work and immediately inform the NSW National Parks & Wildlife Service.
Conditions have been included that reflect the above recommendations.
Council received
a letter from Noel Downs from the Wanaruah Local Aboriginal Land Council
requesting that they be involved in a survey of the subject land. On
Water
The subject land
is not prone to inundation by waters associated with a 1:100 year flood event
of the
Flora & fauna
A flora and fauna assessment of the land was undertaken and included in the Statement of Environmental Effects. The flora and fauna assessment concluded that one threatened species (Grey-crowned Babbler), no endangered populations, and/or endangered ecological communities of State or national environmental significance were observed within the site during the survey period. There is anecdotal evidence, from the previous landowner indicating the presence of two threatened species, namely the Spotted-tailed Quoll and the Brush-tailed phascogale. The clearing of native vegetation will be minimal as a result of the proposal and there is unlikely to be any significant impact on local and/or regional wildlife corridors.
The assessment concludes that there is unlikely to significant impact on matters of State or National Environmental Significance provided the following recommendations are undertaken:
· Retain mature trees where possible;
· Restrict tree felling to periods of low fauna breeding activity such as autumn;
· Assess the occupancy of tree hollows prior to the initiation of land clearing activities;
· Replace tree hollows lost to the redevelopment of the site by erecting appropriately dimensioned nest boxes in suitable locations at a ratio of 2:1 or greater;
· Install road signs on
· Discourage the collection of fallen timber and cutting down of trees (including dead trees) by future residents through appropriate signage at environmentally sensitive locations.
The recommendations of the report are reflected in the recommended conditions of approval.
Natural hazards
Both the subject
property and
It is understood that the existing bridge may be inundated in the larger flood events ie: 100 and 50 year ARI and thus isolating the newly created lots for a short period of time. The applicant will therefore be required to carry out a flooding / drainage study to determine the exact level and duration of inundation of the existing bridge. The study will ensure the bridge is not adversely affected by the calculated flood flows, and will aid in determining the final mode of upgrade to be carried out. The study has not been provided to date and will therefore be conditioned as a deferred commencement condition.
The subject land has a few areas that are within a bushfire prone area. The areas correspond to isolated areas of existing vegetation generally along the south and east boundaries of the land. The proposal is integrated development and was referred to the Rural Fire Service (RFS) for concurrence. The RFS have provided the General Terms of Approval and these are included in the conditions.
Socio-economic impact in the locality
The applicant
advises that the subject land has been farmed by the one family for 40 years
and the previous owner has relocated the business to a larger property with the
intention of expanding the breeding stock and drought proofing the farm,
thereby continuing and developing a sound farming business with benefits to the
wider economy. Property values in the
A school bus
service, postal deliveries and garbage service are available at the junction of
The proposed subdivision will create one small rural retreat and 13 small farming sites which have the potential to increase rural productivity and provide direct and indirect employment and population growth in the Stanhope, Branxton and Singleton communities.
There have been
several similar type developments undertaken in recent years in
New and existing residents will benefit from the establishment and embellishment of community based facilities due to the proponent contribution to Council’s s94 Contributions Plan.
Site design
The layout of the
proposed subdivision includes a new road which runs along the central ridge
with 10 proposed allotments having access to this road and four allotments with
access onto
Cumulative impact
The proposal is
similar to previously approved subdivisions in
Any negative cumulative impact on the existing road network has been addressed by either road upgrading or the payment of contributions to cover the cost of upgrading the existing infrastructure on a “pro rata” basis.
(c) The
suitability of the site for development
.
The proposal is
considered to fit in the locality and the site attributes are considered to be
conducive to the development.
(d) Any
submissions made in accordance with this Act or the regulations.
The proposal was notified for ten days and four submissions were received. The submissions are summarised below and copies are appended to the report as Attachment “S1” to “S4”.
(S1) Maureen
& George Dick – object to the proposal due to
increased noise and dust levels from the additional traffic using
(S2) RB &
RW Johnson – request that
(S3) Rodney Taylor – opposes the proposal because this has been one of the largest and a very successful agricultural enterprise in Stanhope. Mr Taylor is concerned that productive country is being subdivided in the interests of developer profit.
(S4) Linda
& John Butler – request that
PLANNERS COMMENTS
· The issue of road network has been previously discussed in Cl. b Access and transport.
· With the issue of increased noise levels and quality of amenity will deteriorate, it is considered that the subdivision of the land into 40Ha allotments would not have an adverse impact upon the acoustic air quality amenity of the area.
· With the issue that run-off will destroy Stanhope Creek, it is considered that all proposed allotments contain a dwelling site removed from Stanhope Creek. Geotechnical and scientific investigations undertaken have demonstrated that on-site effluent disposal could safely occur on each allotment. The issue of erosion and sedimentation control will be managed via conditions requiring erosion and sediment control. Erosion and sediment control will be considered at development stage with subsequent dwellings proposed for resultant allotments.
· The issue of domestic cats and dogs becoming feral and attacking cats and dogs are no more likely to occur in this locality compared to any other. A condition may be included requiring a “restriction as to user” be created prohibiting domestic cats in relation to the subdivision.
· The issue of the property being run as a
successful cattle breeding enterprise and should not be subdivided is
previously discussed in (a)(i) Any environmental planning instrument
Hunter Regional Environmental Plan 1989.
· The issue of signposting the road will be considered as part of the road upgrading and any signposting considered necessary by Council officers will be included in the construction.
· The issue of a garbage service at the farm gate will be assessed by appropriate Council officers when there is sufficient demand for such a service.
· The issue that the subdivision should protect waterways and riparian zones has been previously discussed above in the third dot point.
(e) The
public interest.
Under the provisions of the Singleton Council Section 94 Contributions Plan No. 1, the following contributions are payable:
· Shire Open Space ($258 x 13)
· Community Facilities ($645 x 13)
· Rural Roads – sealed ($1760 x 13)
· Section 94 Studies
Sustainability:
Social
The social character of an area changes with the subdivision of large
holdings into smaller holding. This
subdivision is consistent with the requirements of relevant planning documents. The proposal will attract Section 94
contributions which will be used to enhance existing and future community
facilities.
It is considered the community is unlikely to sustain any disadvantage
as a result of this proposal.
Environmental
The subject land is predominantly cleared of vegetation. No threats of serious or irreversible environmental damage or lack of scientific certainty have been identified in the environmental investigations undertaken in support of this application.
The flora and fauna assessment concludes that the development is unlikely to impact upon any threatened flora or fauna in the area. The conditions included should ensure that any flora or fauna existing in the area are provided with a reasonable environment for continued survival and that biological diversity and ecological integrity should be conserved for the benefit of future generations.
Financial
The proposal to create 14 allotments where there is currently one agricultural holding is likely to result in diversification and intensification of the agricultural activities on the subject land as well as injection of capital into the activity. It is considered that the conditions recommended should ensure that the environment is protected and preserved which will provide financial sustainability.
Conclusions
The proposal is to subdivide an existing holding with an area of 528 Ha into 14 allotments comprising 13 x 40ha allotments and a concessional allotment with an area of 4.5Ha. The proposal includes the creation of a new access road along the ridge which runs centrally through the property approximately in an east-west direction. The applicant has nominated a suitable dwelling site on each of the proposed allotments which generally complies with Council requirements. The proposal is considered to generally be of merit and is recommended fro approval by deferred commencement pending the submission of information pertaining to the construction of the access road.
|
That the proposal be approved as deferred commencement subject to the following conditions: DEFERRED
COMMENCEMENT CONDITION: The
applicant shall carry out a flooding analysis of the existing bridge over
Stanhope Creek. The bridge shall be modelled for a variety of ARI events up
to and including the 100 year ARI event. The study shall include the level
and duration of any inundation of the bridge and modelling of the impact of
the calculated flood flows on the existing bridge. All calculations shall be
carried out in accordance with Australian Rainfall and Runoff and Council’s
Development Engineering Specifications. Full details and calculations shall
be submitted to and approved by Council. Reason: To ensure adequate and safe access is
available to the development site. This consent does not
operate until this condition has been fulfilled and Council has issued a
written notice to this effect.
1. APPROVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS –
The development shall be carried out in accordance with the development
application, accompanying plans and documents described as PLAN OF PROPOSED
SUBDIVISION OF LOT 12 DP 219780 351 CRANKY CORNER ROAD STANHOPE (revised)
dated 23/08/04 and submitted on 8/6/04
& 25/August 2004. Notes: · Any
alterations to the drawings and/or documentation, as approved by Council,
will require further Council consent as per s96 of the Environmental Planning
and Assessment Act. · No
other works, other than those approved by this consent notice, shall be carried
out without prior consent from Council. 2. SURVEY MARKS - There being no
interference with or destruction of Survey Marks and Council is to be advised
in writing if any such interference occurs. Reason:
To protect the integrity of existing survey marks. 3. COUNCIL INDEMNITY - The Council is to
be indemnified for the cost of damage caused
to Council property (such as kerb and guttering and footpath) during any construction works carried out in
accordance with the approval submitted plans and
accompanying documentation. Reason: To protect Council from incurring costs associated with damage caused by a third party.
4. RESTRICTION ON CONSTRUCTION WORKS - Construction activities on the site being carried out between 7.00 a.m. and 6.00 p.m. Monday to Friday and 8.00 a.m. to 1.00 p.m. Saturday (Sundays and Public Holidays prohibited) and not interfering with the amenity of the neighbourhood by reason of noise, dust or interference with traffic. Reason: To protect the existing amenity of the locality. 5. RESTRICTION ON WORKS – No spoil or fill
is to encroach upon the adjacent bushland/public
reserve during the duration of works.
Reason:
To protect the existing amenity the locality and Council’s existing infrastructure.
6. DRAINAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION - No interference to the flows in the watercourses during the construction of the proposed culverts and/or bridges, roads and associated works. Reason: To protect the existing waterways and reduce the risk of environmental damage. 7. REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY WORKS - All
temporary drainage, silt and sediment control devices are to be removed at
the completion of construction works and disturbed areas restored to the
satisfaction of Council. Reason: To clarify the terms of consent. 8. CONSTRUCTION SIGNS - During the
construction period, a sign of approximately 2 metres by 2 metres is to
be erected to display particulars relating to the proposed works, including
the name of the subdivider, the project supervisor, the contractor, a contact
number for complaints or inquiries, and the hours of work. The sign is to be maintained in good condition during the construction period. Reason: To clarify the terms of consent. 9. SUBDIVISION CERTIFICATE FEE – Payment
of a Subdivision Certificate Fee being 120.00, prior to the final plan of
subdivision being endorsed by Council. Reason: To comply with Council’s adopted fees and
charges. 10. SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS - Following the
final survey, each lot is to comply with Council's subdivision requirements. Reason: To ensure that the subdivision is carried
out in accordance with Council’s subdivision requirements. 11. COMPLETION OF WORKS - Construction of all
works to Council's satisfaction prior to the lodgement and release of the
final plan of subdivision. Reason: To ensure
completion of construction prior to registration of the linen plan. 12. SUBDIVISION CERTIFICATE – Submission of
an application for a Subdivision Certificate accompanied by the final plan of
subdivision and 5 prints pursuant to Clause 79R of the Environmental Planning
and Assessment Amendment Regulation 1998. Reason: To provide for
certification of the subdivision plan. 13. SUBMISSION OF ENGINEERING PLANS -
Submission of an application for a Construction Certificate and 3 copies of
engineering plans and specifications in accordance
with Singleton Shire Councils Development Design and Construction. Specifications shall be provided for
approval prior to the commencement of construction works. The following plans are to be provided:- a. Minimum
80km/h design speed. b. The
access road (from Cranky Corner Road to the eastern boundary of proposed Lot
3) to be designed in accordance with Council’s Rural Road Construction
standard being an 8 metre wide formation with a 7 metre wide, 2 coat bitumen
seal and a minimum pavement thickness of 220 mm . c. The
access road (from the eastern boundary of proposed Lot 3 onwards) to be
designed in accordance with Council’s Rural Road Construction standard being
an 6 metre wide formation with a 4 metre wide , 2 coat bitumen seal and a
minimum pavement thickness of 200 mm . Sealed passing bays are required every
200 metres. d. Provision
for an internal radial turning path of 12.5 m at the end of the cul de sac. e. Cranky
Corner Road from the western boundary of the site to the proposed access road
to be designed in accordance with Council’s Rural Road Construction standard
being an 8 metre wide formation with a 7 metre wide , 2 coat bitumen seal and
a minimum pavement thickness of 220 mm . f. Cranky
Corner Road from the proposed access road to midway along the boundary of
proposed Lot 1 be designed in accordance with Council’s Rural Road
Construction standard being an 6 metre wide formation with a 4 metre wide, 2
coat bitumen seal and a minimum pavement thickness of 200 mm. g. Sediment
and erosion controls to be implemented before, during and after construction. e. Stormwater
Management Plan - provision of a stormwater management plan to serve the
proposed subdivision. The stormwater drainage design shall be based on the
publication "Australian Rainfall and Runoff" (The Institution of
Engineers, 1987) with recurrence intervals as follows - Trunk drainage 1
in 10 year Bridges and other major
structures 1 in
50 year Overland flow paths 1
in 100 year Reason: To ensure that adequate and safe all weather
access is available to the development.
14. ACCESS CROSSING - Construct a suitably
drained, gravelled and bitumen sealed vehicular access crossing from the edge
of the access road to each property boundary, in accordance with Singleton
Council's standard for Access to Rural Properties. Reason: To ensure the
provision of all weather vehicular access to each lot.
15. CONSTRUCTION OF ENGINEERING
WORKS - Construction of all road, stormwater drainage and
bulk earthworks associated with the development in accordance
with the plans to be approved in respect of Condition 12 above. Reason: To ensure that adequate and safe all weather
access is available to the development. 16. RESTRICTION ON
CONSTRUCTION WORKS - Construction activities on the site being carried out
between 7.00 a.m. and 6.00 p.m. Monday to Friday and 8.00 a.m. and 1.00 p.m.
Saturday and no work shall be carried out on Sunday or a Public Holiday. Construction shall not interfere with the
amenity of the neighbourhood by reason of noise and/or dust nor interfere
with traffic. Reason: To protect the existing amenity of the
locality. 17. SUBMISSION OF PLAN - At the completion of construction works for each
subdivision stage, a "works as
executed" plan is to be prepared and submitted to Council. Reason: To
ensure the works have been carried out in accordance with the approved plans. 18. RURAL ADDRESSING – Payment of a fee as set by
Singleton Council’s Fees and Charges of
fifty dollars per additional lot created for Rural Addressing of the lot. This
fee is subject to annual adjustment such that the actual contribution payable is that
fee payable at the date of release of the linen plan of subdivision or the date of prior payment,
whichever occurs first. Reason: To
comply with Council’s adopted fees and charges. 19. VEGETATION
REMOVAL - Any vegetation and or trees removed as a consequence of this approval shall not be burnt on the site.
Onsite mulching of the material
is recommended. Reason: To minimise waste and
pollution. 20. The
applicant shall upgrade a. Minimum
80km/h design speed. b. Council’s
Rural Road Construction standard being an 8 metre wide formation with a 7
metre wide, 2 coat bitumen seal and a minimum pavement thickness of 220mm. Reason: To ensure 21. The applicant shall make a monetary
contribution towards the upgrading of the timber bridge on 22. TREE REMOVAL –
Mature trees are to be retained wherever possible. Any tree clearing that is necessary to undertake
construction work may be cleared only during periods
of low fauna breeding activity (such as autumn). Prior
to clearing any trees an assessment of the occupancy of tree hollows shall be
undertaken. Where necessary, tree hollows shall be vacated and fauna relocated
to a suitable habitat structure by a suitably experienced ecologist. Tree
hollows lost due to development on the site shall be replaced with appropriately dimensioned nest boxes in suitable
locations at a ratio of 2:1 or greater. Reason: To ensure that existing fauna habitat is protected. 23. WILDLIFE
SIGNS – A road sign shall be installed adjacent to A separate Development Approval will be required for
the sign. Reason: To advise drivers of the resident native
wildlife and to protect native wildlife. 24. ARCHAEOLOGICAL
SITES – Archaeological sites numbered Stanhope Creek 9, 15
& 17 in the accompanying Statement of Environmental Effects are to be protected by a buffer. The size of the buffer is
to be determined by the nature and extent of the site and the
buffer must be large enough to protect the site from damage. A “restriction as to user” is to be included
advising of the presence of Aboriginal artefacts on the relevant allotments
and advising that no development is to occur within the buffer surrounding
the artefacts. Reason: To ensure the
protection of significant Aboriginal artefacts. 25. ARCHAEOLOGICAL
SITES – Should any works be undertaken that are likely to affect
any Aboriginal sites and/or objects a Section 90 Consent Approval under the NSW
National Parks & Wildlife Service Act 1974 is required prior to
undertaking any such work. Should any Aboriginal objects or sites be located
during development on the subject land, the developer is required by law to
stop all work and immediately inform the NSW national Parks & Wildlife
Service Reason: To advise the applicant of their responsibilities
under the s 90 of the NSW National Parks & Wildlife Service Act 1975 and
to protect Aboriginal objects and/or sites. 26. FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTIONS – Payment of the
following contributions pursuant to Section 94 of the Environmental Planning
and Assessment Act 1979 and Council’s Section 94 Contributions Plan No. 1. Contributions are subject to annual adjustment such
that the actual contributions will be those current at the date of payment. Community
Facilities $ 8502.00 Local
& Shire Open Space $ 3354.00 Rural
Roads $22,880.00 Section
94 Studies $ 21.00 The payments are to be received by Council prior to
the release of the linen plan. Reason: To implement Council’s Section 94
Contribution Plan No. 1, a copy of which is available for inspection at
Council offices during normal office hours. 27. The Following General Terms of Approval
have been submitted by the (NSW Rural Fire Service) and are included as
conditions on this approval:- A tank with a capacity of at least 5,000 litres for
a dedicated fire fighting supply shall be provided for each dwelling. A 65mm
or 38mm Storz fitting and ball or gate valve shall be installed in each tank. Reason: To ensure the requirements of the (NSW Rural Fire Service) are observed. 28. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL – All work
undertaken in association with this application shall comply with the
requirements of Council’s Erosion and Sediment Control Development Control
Plan. It is the proponent’s responsibility to ensure that all contractors and
sub-contractors comply with this requirement. Reason: To prevent the land from being degraded, to
protect waterways from being degraded and to promote and protect
biodiversity. 29. ELECTRICITY – The submission of
documentary evidence from Energy · The provision of easements in favour of Energy Australia over
private land for existing and proposed power lines and where the development
requires the relocation of power lines or other assets of Energy Australia. · The provision of a grid based overhead electricity supply to each
of the resultant lots of the subdivision. Reason: To ensure the provision of power to each resultant lot in accordance with Council policy. |
|
AT-1 View |
Locality Plan |
1 page(s) |
|
AT-2 View |
Proposed Subdivision Plan |
1 page(s) |
|
AT-3 View |
Letter for NSW Department of Primary Industries |
2 page(s) |
|
AT-4 View |
Letter Jall Projects |
2 page(s) |
|
AT-5 View |
Archaeological Risk Assessment Plan |
1 page(s) |
|
AT-6 View |
S1 - Objection Letter |
1 page(s) |
|
AT-7 View |
S2 - Objection Letter |
1 page(s) |
|
AT-8 View |
S3 - Objection Letter |
1 page(s) |
|
AT-9 View |
S4 - Objection Letter |
1 page(s) |
|
Manager Planning & Development Report No. 11/04 |
|
|
Locality Plan |
Subdivision - 14 Allotments |
|
|
|

|
Manager Planning & Development Report No. 11/04 |
|
|
Proposed Subdivision Plan |
Subdivision - 14 Allotments |
|
|
|

|
Manager Planning & Development Report No. 11/04 |
|
|
Letter for NSW Department of Primary Industries |
Subdivision - 14 Allotments |
|
|
|


|
Manager Planning & Development Report No. 11/04 |
|
|
Letter Jall Projects |
Subdivision - 14 Allotments |
|
|
|


|
Manager Planning & Development Report No. 11/04 |
|
|
Archaeological Risk Assessment Plan |
Subdivision - 14 Allotments |
|
|
|

|
Manager Planning & Development Report No. 11/04 |
|
|
S1 - Objection Letter |
Subdivision - 14 Allotments |
|
|
|

|
Manager Planning & Development Report No. 11/04 |
|
|
S2 - Objection Letter |
Subdivision - 14 Allotments |
|
|
|

|
Manager Planning & Development Report No. 11/04 |
|
|
S3 - Objection Letter |
Subdivision - 14 Allotments |
|
|
|

|
Manager Planning & Development Report No. 11/04 |
|
|
S4 - Objection Letter |
Subdivision - 14 Allotments |
|
|
|

|
SINGLETON COUNCIL Minutes_Item |
Meeting of the Corporate and Development Services Committee - 13 September 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Planning & Development Report No. 10/04 |
|
|
|
|
6. |
WATER QUALITY
MONITORING PROGRAM Author: Brian
Thomas |
FILE: 01/0161 |
|
|
|
|
AT-1 View |
Water Quality Monitoring Program - August |
1 page(s) |
|
Manager Planning & Development Report No. 11/04 |
|
|
Water Quality Monitoring Program - August |
WATER QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM |
|
|
|

|
SINGLETON COUNCIL Minutes_Item |
Meeting of the Corporate and Development Services Committee - 13 September 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Planning & Development Report No. 10/04 |
|
|
|
|
7. |
United Coal
Mine CCC Author: Brian
Thomas |
FILE: 03-0286 |
|
Executive
Summary The Development Consent for United Coal Mine, issued by the Minister assisting the Minister for Infrastructure & Planning, requires the establishment of a Community Consultative Committee. The committee will oversee the environmental performance of the development. Notices were placed in the Singleton Argus and Hunter Valley News seeking nominations from the public to fill the two community representative positions. Council did not receive any response to these notices. The Mine then letterbox dropped the local area resulting in nominations from Laurie Kelly of Warkworth & Helen Holz of Jerry’s Plains. Copies of their nomination letters are provided to Councillors under separate cover. Council will need to make an appointment so that the committee can be formed. |
|
1. That Council appoint Mr Kelly & Mrs Holz to represent the Community on the United Mine Community Consultative Committee. 2. That
Council appoint a Councillor to the position of Chairperson of the Committee. |
There are no attachments for this report.
|
8. |
Minutes of
Glennies Creek Community Consultative Committee Author: Brian
Thomas |
FILE: 01/0282 |
|
|
A special meeting of the Glennies Creek
Colliery Community Consultative Committee was held on
The minutes of the meeting are appended to this report as an attachment.
|
|
|
AT-1 View |
Minutes of Glennies Creek Colliery Community Consultative Committee Meeting |
2 page(s) |
|
Manager Planning & Development Report No. 11/04 |
|
|
Minutes of Glennies Creek Colliery Community
Consultative Commitee Meeting |
Minutes of Glennies Creek Community Consultative
Committee |
|
|
|


|
SINGLETON COUNCIL Minutes_Item |
Meeting of the Corporate and Development Services Committee - 13 September 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Planning & Development Report No. 10/04 |
|
|
|
|
9. |
Author: Brian
Thomas |
FILE: 03/0047 |
The four monthly meeting of the Hunter
Valley Operations Community Consultative Committee was held on
|
|
|
AT-1 View |
Minutes of Hunter Valley Operations Community Consultative Committee meeting |
3 page(s) |
|
Manager Planning & Development Report No. 11/04 |
|
|
Minutes of Hunter Valley Operations Community
Consultative Committee meeting |
Hunter Valley Operations CCC |
|
|
|



|
SINGLETON COUNCIL Minutes_Item |
Meeting of the Corporate and Development Services Committee - 13 September 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Planning & Development Report No. 10/04 |
|
|
|
|
10. |
Camberwell
Coal Community Consultative Committee Author: Brian
Thomas |
FILE: 02/0063 |
|
Detail |
The six monthly meeting of the Camberwell
Coal Mine Community Consultative Committee was held on
The minutes of the meeting are appended to this report as an attachment.
|
|
|
AT-1 View |
Minutes of Camberwell Coal Community Consultative Committee Meeting |
3 page(s) |
|
Manager Planning & Development Report No. 11/04 |
|
|
Minutes of Camberwell Coal Community Consultative
Committee Meeting |
Camberwell Coal Community Consultative Committee |
|
|
|



|
SINGLETON COUNCIL Minutes_Item |
Meeting of the Corporate and Development Services Committee - 13 September 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Planning & Development Report No. 10/04 |
|
|
|
|
11. |
Minutes of
Liddell Coal Mine Community Consultative Committee Meeting Author: Brian
Thomas |
FILE: 02/0340 |
|
|
The six monthly meeting of the Liddell Coal
Community Consultative Committee was held on
|
|
|
AT-1 View |
Minutes of Liddell Coal Mine Community Consultative Committee Meeting |
3 page(s) |
|
Manager Planning & Development Report No. 11/04 |
|
|
Minutes of Liddell Coal Mine Community Consultative
Committee Meeting |
Minutes of Liddell Coal Mine Community Consultative
Committee Meeting |
|
|
|



|
SINGLETON COUNCIL Minutes_Item |
Meeting of the Corporate and Development Services Committee - 13 September 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Planning & Development Report No. 10/04 |
|
|
|
|
12. |
Minutes of
Ashton Coal Mine Community Consultative Committee Meeting Author: Brian
Thomas |
FILE: 03/0051 |
The four monthly meeting of the Ashton Mine
Community Consultative Committee was held on
|
|
|
AT-1 View |
Minutes of Ashton Coal Mine Community Consultative Committee Meeting |
3 page(s) |
M Ihlein K
Manager Planning & Development Services Director
Corporate & Development Services
|
Manager Planning & Development Report No. 11/04 |
|
|
Minutes of Ashton Coal Mine Community Consultative
Committee Meeting |
Minutes of Ashton Coal Mine Community Consultative
Committee Meeting |
|
|
|


